Moving to the States on an E-3 and selling your Australian home around the same time? 

There’s a simple timing difference between Australia and the US that can quietly turn a tax-free Australian sale into a taxable gain in America. 

The fix is usually straightforward—but you need to plan the dates.

Two Countries, Two Clocks

• Australia – For capital gains tax (CGT), the “disposal” of property happens when you sign the contract. If it’s your main residence, the Australian rules can often wipe out the gain at that point.
• United States – For income tax, the sale generally happens when you settle/close—the day title and the benefits of ownership pass.

If you sign in March (Australia sees the disposal then) but you don’t settle until May, the US sees a May sale.

Why E-3 Arrivals Get Caught

US tax residency doesn’t depend on your visa—it’s driven by a day-count test (the “substantial presence” test). 

In the year you meet that test, your US residency start date is effectively the first day you set foot in the US that year.

Here’s the rub:

• Before you arrive – You’re a non-resident for US tax.
• After you arrive (and once you meet the day-count) – You’re a US tax resident from that first day of presence forward.

So, if you arrive before settlement, the US treats the later settlement as a sale while you’re a resident—even if Australia already treated the sale at contract and applied the main residence exemption. 

Australia may charge no tax, leaving you with no credit to use against the US bill.

“Won’t The Treaty Save Me?”

Often not. 

The Australia–US tax treaty allows each country to tax its residents under their own rules. 

Once you’re a US resident for tax, the US can tax your worldwide gains—including your Australian home—despite Australia’s main residence outcome. 

In short: great treaty, unhelpful here.

The Good News: The US Home-Sale Exclusion

The US has its own main-home relief. 

If you owned and lived in the home for any two years in the five years before settlement, you can generally exclude up to USD $250,000 of gain (USD $500,000 for many married couples filing jointly).

A home outside the US can qualify—there’s no requirement it be on American soil.

A couple of friendly clarifications:

• You don’t need to be living there on the day of settlement. A reasonable period after moving out is fine.
• If your gain is bigger than the exclusion, the excess is taxed at US capital gains rates.

A Simple Example

March – You sign a contract to sell your Sydney home. Australia treats the disposal now, and—because it’s your main residence—there’s no Australian CGT.

April – You fly to the US to start your E-3 job. From that first day in April (once you meet the day-count), you’re a US tax resident.

May – The sale settles. The US sees a May sale while you’re a resident. Unless the US home-sale exclusion fully covers the gain, you could have US tax to pay—with no Australian credit to offset it.

What Smart Planning Looks Like

Sequence The Dates

The cleanest solution is to settle before you set foot in the US for that year. 

If that’s not possible, see if settlement can be brought forward.

Use The US Exclusion

Check whether you meet the 2-out-of-5-year ownership and use test. 

Keep tidy records of when you lived there and of any renovations/improvements (they can increase your cost base for US purposes).

Play The Day-Count Carefully

If you’ll be in the US for less than half the year, there are limited rules that may let you remain a non-resident for US tax that year (if your main ties stay in Australia). 

This is a facts-and-paperwork exercise—worth exploring before you travel.

Mind The Currency

Your US return is in US dollars, so exchange rates can make your US gain look bigger or smaller than it feels in AUD.

If you have an AUD mortgage, paying it off at settlement can create a separate US-tax currency gain or loss. It’s manageable—just don’t be surprised by it.

Quick Checklist Before You Fly

1. Ask The Agent/Solicitor – Can we accelerate settlement?
2. Map Your Days – When exactly will you land in the US? Can you delay arrival until after settlement if needed?
3. Confirm Eligibility – Do you meet the US home-sale exclusion? Gather proof of ownership, occupancy, and improvements.
4. Model The Numbers – Estimate the gain in USD and test different arrival/settlement dates.
5. Paperwork Plan – If you’ll be under 183 days in the US this year and keeping your life in Australia, ask whether an exception to US residency could apply.

Common Myths—Busted

• My visa type decides my tax.” No—the day-count does.
• “If Australia doesn’t tax it, the US can’t.” Not true once you’re a US tax resident.
• “I must be living there on settlement day to claim US relief.” Not required—you just need the 2-out-of-5-year history.

The Bottom Line

For many Aussies heading over on an E-3, the only real “trap” is timing. Australia taxes at contract, the US taxes at settlement. 

Arrive in the US before settlement and your main residence can suddenly have a US tax bill attached. 

The best defences are simple: settle before you arrive where possible, lean on the US home-sale exclusion, and plan your day-count.

Add a quick currency sense-check, and you’ll turn a potential headache into a non-event.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), signed into law on July 4, 2025, is the most sweeping U.S. tax overhaul since 2017. 

While it extends many Tax Cuts, it also introduces new provisions that affect inbound and outbound expatriates. 

Below we summarize key changes and considerations, including new deductions, changes to foreign earned income provisions, reporting obligations, and residency rules.

New Deductions Or Changes For Foreign Nationals Moving To The U.S. (Inbound Expats)

Moving Expense Deduction

Unfortunately for new U.S. residents, OBBBA permanently disallows the moving expense deduction (and the exclusion for employer-paid moving reimbursements) for non-military taxpayers. 

This means foreign nationals relocating for work can no longer deduct their moving costs (which had been suspended under TCJA and now will not return). 

In practice, inbound employees should negotiate tax gross-ups on moving packages, since moving benefits are fully taxable. Only active-duty military (and certain intelligence community members) remain eligible for the moving expense deduction.

Standard Deduction And Dual-Status Issues

OBBBA locked in a much larger standard deduction (now $15,750 single / $31,500 joint for 2025 and indexed) as a permanent feature. 

However, non-resident aliens still cannot use the standard deduction. 

A foreign national who arrives mid-year will file as a dual-status alien, generally paying U.S. tax only on U.S.-source income for the non-resident portion of the year, but with no standard deduction for that part. 

If they qualify, they might elect to be treated as U.S. resident for the full year (under IRC §7701(b)(4)) to claim the standard deduction – but that subjects their full-year worldwide income to U.S. tax. 

These first-year elections rules are unchanged under OBBBA, so careful timing and modeling is needed to decide the optimal filing status.

Tax Treaty Provisions

Inbound taxpayers should also review tax treaty provisions. If a treaty tie-breaker would treat them as resident of their home country for part of the year, they may use that (since they are not U.S. citizens, the treaty saving clause doesn’t bar it), though doing so can be complex. 

OBBBA did not create any new inbound tax exemptions or basis step-ups – meaning new residents receive no automatic step-up in basis for assets they owned before moving. 

Planning Tip. For inbound individuals – consider disposing of highly appreciated foreign assets before becoming a U.S. resident, or to be prepared for U.S. tax on the full gain if sold post-arrival (since U.S. basis will generally be original cost).

“Remittance Tax” On Outbound Transfers

A novel provision imposes a 1% excise tax on certain money transfers from the U.S. to foreign recipients (effective for transfers after 2025). 

This is aimed at cash remittances – for example, an expat worker in the U.S. sending cash to family overseas via a money transfer service would pay a 1% tax, collected by the remittance provider. 

However, transfers from U.S. bank accounts or by U.S. debit/credit card are exempt, so immigrants and foreign workers in the U.S. can plan around this by using bank-to-bank transfers instead of cash remittance services to avoid the fee. 

While not a “deduction,” this new tax is a consideration for inbound expats who regularly send funds abroad.

Other Inbound Notes

OBBBA’s major individual tax cuts (rate reductions, bigger child credits, etc.) generally benefit U.S. residents and citizens across the board, including recent arrivals. 

For example, the Child Tax Credit (CTC) was increased to $2,500 per child (from $2,000). 

However, the act tightened ID requirements. Now at least one parent filing jointly must have an SSN to claim the refundable portion of the CTC. 

This is actually easier than the initially proposed rule that both parents have SSNs – a relief for mixed-nationality couples. 

Children still need SSNs (ITINs don’t qualify) as before. Inbound expats should obtain SSNs for themselves and their U.S.-citizen children as soon as possible to maximize credits.

Finally, note that state tax obligations might still follow a new arrival (if they establish residency in a U.S. state). 

OBBBA temporarily raised the federal state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap from $10k to $40k (through 2029, with AGI phase-outs). This provides some relief if a new resident pays significant state/local taxes. 

However, non-residents and dual-status filers generally cannot benefit from the standard deduction or SALT deduction unless they elect full-year residency, so the practical benefit is limited to those fully subject to U.S. tax.

Changes For Americans Moving Or Living Abroad (Outbound Expats)

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE) And Housing Exclusion

The FEIE – a key tax break for U.S. expats – continues unchanged in mechanism, with annual inflation adjustments. 

For 2025, the FEIE cap rises to $130,000 per qualifying individual (up from $126,500 in 2024). 

Married couples who both qualify can exclude up to $260,000 of foreign wage or self-employment income. 

The foreign housing exclusion/deduction was also adjusted. The base housing amount is $20,800 and the general housing cost limit about $39,000 for 2025 (with higher caps for certain high-cost cities abroad). 

Bottom line. Americans abroad can exclude a bit more income due to inflation indexing; OBBBA did not restrict these exclusions. 

Expats should continue to track their bona fide residence or physical presence test status carefully each year to maintain FEIE eligibility – the law did not change the qualification tests (12+ months abroad or 330-day rule).

Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) And Tax Treaties

One initial concern was a provision known as Section 899 (nicknamed the “revenge tax”) that would have penalized Americans in countries with “unfair” taxes (initially aimed at nations with digital services taxes, etc.), effectively limiting the use of foreign tax credits in those cases. 

Good news. After international pushback, Section 899 was removed from the final bill. Thus, U.S. expats retain full access to the FTC* to offset foreign income taxes paid, and no new surtax will apply on income from any particular country. 

The FTC system remains as before, so Americans abroad can generally credit foreign taxes dollar-for-dollar against U.S. tax on the same income (up to limits), helping avoid double taxation in high-tax countries. 

In fact, one tweak in OBBBA actually improves FTC usage for some expats. The act reduces the “deemed paid” foreign tax credit haircut from 20% to 10%. 

This mostly affects those with GILTI (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income) from controlled foreign corporations – now renamed “Net CFC Tested Income” – where previously only 80% of foreign taxes were creditable. Going forward, 90% of foreign taxes on GILTI/NCTI will be creditable. 

For an entrepreneur abroad who owns a foreign corporation, this could modestly lower U.S. tax on high-taxed foreign earnings (since more of the foreign tax can offset U.S. tax). 

Other international business provisions – like making the CFC look-through rule permanent and restoring certain attribution rules – may ease tax burdens on expats with complex structures.

No Switch To Pure Residency-Based Taxation (Yet)

Despite hopes in the expat community, OBBBA did not end citizenship-based taxation. 

U.S. citizens and green card holders are still taxed on worldwide income regardless of residence. President Trump had promised to “end double taxation” on Americans abroad and supported a residence-based taxation (RBT) proposal, but that was not included in this bill. 

A separate bill (the LaHood RBT Act) was introduced and may be debated later, but as of now nothing has changed: Americans abroad must continue filing annual U.S. tax returns, FBARs, etc., on their worldwide income and assets. 

The FEIE and FTC remain the primary tools to mitigate double taxation. 

Tax treaties also remain in effect, but remember the “saving clause” in U.S. treaties generally prevents U.S. citizens from using treaty residency tie-breakers to avoid U.S. tax. 

OBBBA did not alter any treaty provisions or the saving clause. (In practical terms, a U.S. citizen cannot use a tax treaty to claim non-residency and escape U.S. tax – you’d have to expatriate to do that. For long-term green card holders, using a treaty to be treated as a non-resident can trigger the expatriation rules – see below.)

Foreign Housing, Meals, And Other Deductions

Aside from the FEIE/housing exclusion adjustments noted, OBBBA didn’t take away expat-specific deductions. 

For instance, the housing exclusion formula under §911 remains in place. 

Some expats who work for foreign employers may have access to tax-equalization or housing reimbursement plans – those too are unchanged by the law (though employers might need to recalibrate tax projections given other changes). 

One Item To Note. If an outbound U.S. employee was hoping the moving expense deduction might be restored for their move abroad, that is not the case – as mentioned, moving expense write-offs remain disallowed for civilians. Employers should gross-up any moving allowances for U.S. employees relocating overseas, since those payments will be taxable compensation to the employee.

Estate And Gift Tax Relief

Many Americans abroad worry about U.S. estate tax on worldwide assets. 

OBBBA increased the unified estate/gift tax exclusion to $15 million per individual (up from ~$14M). This high exemption (available through 2030) greatly reduces the number of expats subject to U.S. estate tax. 

It also presents a planning opportunity. Wealthy expats considering renouncing U.S. citizenship can use the large gift exemption now to shed assets and potentially get their net worth below the $2 million “covered expatriate” threshold. 

By utilizing the $15M exemption to gift assets tax-free now, an expat could avoid the exit tax entirely upon expatriation. (For example, an American abroad with $10M net worth can gift, say, $5M to a trust for their children – using up part of the $15M exemption – and thereafter be under $2M net worth, avoiding covered expatriate status if they renounce.) 

Caution. The $15M exemption isn’t guaranteed forever; it’s set to revert (likely to ~$6M) in 2031 unless extended. 

Thus, expats with estate tax concerns might act sooner rather than later. OBBBA did not otherwise change the exit tax regime under §877A – any U.S. citizen or long-term green card holder who expatriates with net worth above $2M (or failing other tests) still faces the mark-to-market exit tax. 

Proper planning (now aided by the high exemption) remains crucial.

New Reporting Burdens And Compliance Changes (And Planning Responses)

A major theme of OBBBA is increased tax compliance and enforcement, including for international filers. 

Key changes that inbound/outbound taxpayers should note:

• Expanded Foreign Asset Reporting – The law authorizes lower thresholds for FATCA Form 8938 and FBAR reporting and even for foreign gift reporting. While the IRS hasn’t yet announced new limits, OBBBA gives Treasury the green light to “lower the bar” for reporting foreign accounts and assets. Currently, U.S. expats must file an FBAR (FinCEN 114) if aggregate foreign accounts > $10,000, and Form 8938 if foreign financial assets > $200,000 (single) at year-end. These thresholds could drop, meaning more expats may have to file these forms going forward.
  
  Foreign gifts/inheritances – Today, a U.S. person must file Form 3520 if they receive > $100,000 from a foreign individual or > ~$18,000 from a foreign corporation/trust.
  
  OBBBA significantly lowers these thresholds (exact new amounts TBD). 
  
  This means more expats will trigger Form 3520 filings for even modest gifts or bequests from abroad. 
  
  While such foreign gifts remain non-taxable, the penalty for failing to report can be 25% of the gift – so this is a serious compliance point. International tax advisors should flag any inbound gift to a client, no matter how small, to see if it now requires a report.
  
• Accelerated Deadlines & Shorter Extensions – The Act directs alignment of some expat filing deadlines closer to domestic deadlines. U.S. taxpayers abroad have traditionally enjoyed an automatic 2-month filing extension to June 15, with further extensions to October (and even December in some cases). OBBBA shortens this window. Expect tighter due dates for international filings, possibly ending the automatic June 15 extension. 
  
  For example, the due date for filing a Form 3520 or Form 5471 might be pulled forward. We await IRS guidance, but practitioners should prepare expats to file earlier and not rely on lengthy extensions. The era of casually filing an expat return in October might be over – timely attention to April 15 (or a nearer date) is advised once rules are clarified.
  
• Stiffer Penalties and Enforcement – Congress has hiked penalties for international non-compliance across the board. Failure to file an FBAR, Form 8938, 5471, 3520, etc., will carry even heavier fines than before, and the IRS is mandated to step up international enforcement (with funding previously allocated to IRS enforcement largely preserved). Also, expect greater data sharing between IRS and foreign tax authorities. 
  
  For expats, this means less margin for error – every foreign account, asset, and entity must be reported meticulously. 
  
  It’s prudent to perform a “compliance check-up”. Ensure all past FBARs and international forms have been filed (the Streamlined Procedures remain an option to clean up past omissions, ideally before penalties hit). 
  
  OBBBA’s message is clear: the compliance net is tightening.
  
• Small Business and Investment Tweaks – Expat entrepreneurs will face some new wrinkles. OBBBA instructs Treasury to limit Section 179 expensing and certain small-business deductions on foreign assets/businesses. 
  
  In practice, if an American abroad owns a foreign business or rental property, they may not be able to immediately deduct equipment purchases (§179) placed in service overseas as liberally as a domestic business. 
  
  There may also be new anti-abuse rules for expats claiming business losses or expenses from abroad. 
  
  Details will emerge in IRS guidance, but tax professionals should be prepared to recalculate assignment cost projections for employers and reassess expat entrepreneurs’ estimated taxes. 
  
  On the investment side, note that no relief was provided from the PFIC rules or the transition tax/GILTI regime that hit many expats after 2017 – those remain in effect. (If anything, as noted, GILTI was slightly modified to be more inclusionary by reducing the §250 deduction to 40%, but high foreign tax credits mitigate its impact for many.) 
  
  Expats should continue to avoid foreign mutual funds (PFICs) or be ready to file Form 8621 annually.

Planning Opportunities

Despite increased burdens, OBBBA opens some planning avenues:

• Use of the Higher FEIE and Credits – With a ~$130k exclusion, expats on the margin might newly avoid all U.S. tax by ensuring salary splits or housing allowances that maximize use of the FEIE + housing exclusion. Also, the slightly larger Child Tax Credit can mean bigger refunds for those with qualifying kids (make sure to claim the Additional CTC if eligible).
• Estate/Gift and Expatriation Planning – As discussed, the $15M lifetime exclusion offers a window for high-net-worth expats to reorganize wealth (gifts, trust funding, etc.) while U.S. estate tax is minimal. It can facilitate an exit strategy or simply provide peace of mind that one’s estate won’t be taxed absent very large assets.
• State Tax Considerations – Expats retaining state residency (or planning a move abroad mid-year) might benefit from the temporary SALT deduction increase if they itemize. For example, an expat who sells a U.S. home or has high state tax in the year of departure can potentially deduct up to $40k of it federally now – factor this into timing (maybe accelerate income/transactions into 2025-2029 to utilize the higher cap).
• Remittance Tax Avoidance – Inbound foreign workers should shift from cash remittances to bank transfers, as noted, to legally avoid the 1% excise.

In short, global tax planning is more critical than ever. 

Expats should coordinate U.S. and foreign tax strategies. For instance, a reduction in U.S. tax by FEIE could expose them to unused foreign tax credits (since you can’t claim credit on excluded income), so one might choose the FTC over FEIE in certain scenarios to maximize overall benefit. Each expat’s situation must be modeled under the new rules to uncover the best approach.

Residency Tie-Breakers, Dual-Status And First/Last-Year Residency Cases

OBBBA did not change the fundamental residency rules for tax purposes – but it adds context:

• Dual-Status Taxpayers – Individuals who are U.S. resident for part of the year and non-resident for part (e.g. the year of arrival or departure) will still file split-year returns as before. One caveat. Because the standard deduction is now permanently high and still unavailable to non-residents, dual-status filers get no standard deduction (and no personal exemption, as exemptions remain $0) for the non-resident portion. 
  
  This can result in higher taxable income in a split year. 
  
  Strategies remain the same – e.g., if arriving late in the year, consider electing to be treated as a full-year resident (if eligible under the first-year election rules) to claim the full standard deduction and credits, especially if foreign income for the pre-arrival part was low or already taxed abroad. 
  
  Conversely, if departing mid-year, one typically does not want to be taxed as a U.S. resident for the full calendar year. In those cases, use the “last-year” residency termination rules (IRC §7701(b)(2)(A)(iii) and (B)) by showing a closer connection to the new country and limited U.S. presence after departure. 
  
  OBBBA introduced no new relief or complexity in these calculations – it’s status quo. 
  
  However, watch the new accelerated filing deadlines. A dual-status taxpayer can’t procrastinate filing until October; if extension periods are reduced, they may need to file by spring with all necessary information on worldwide income ready. 
  
  Early coordination with foreign employers for income statements is advised.

• Tax Treaty Tie-Breakers – Many U.S. tax treaties have residency “tie-breaker” provisions that determine a single country of residence when both countries claim someone as a resident in a given year. 
  
  As noted, U.S. citizens cannot fully escape U.S. taxation via treaty due to the saving clause (the U.S. reserves the right to tax its citizens as if the treaty didn’t exist). 
  
  OBBBA did not amend any treaties or the saving clause. For non-citizens, such as a foreign national who becomes a U.S. resident but remains a tax resident of their home country, the treaty tie-breaker could be invoked to treat them as non-resident in one of the countries. 
  
  That process remains the same – though one should be mindful – if a long-term green card holder uses a treaty to be treated as non-resident of the U.S., that action can be considered a form of expatriation (essentially a surrender of their green card for tax purposes) potentially subjecting them to the exit tax under §877A. 
  
  OBBBA did not change this anti-treaty-shopping rule for long-term residents. 
  
  Thus, dual-status and treaty positions should be taken with caution and full disclosure (Form 8833 is required for treaty-based return positions).
  
• Increased Scrutiny – While the rules haven’t changed, the enforcement environment has. The law’s new reporting and documentation demands could indirectly affect residency determinations. 
  
  For example, more aggressive information reporting might flag an individual who claims to be a non-resident via a treaty tie-breaker but still has significant U.S. indicia. 
  
  In practice, an American abroad who asserts treaty benefits (say, to exempt foreign pension income under a treaty article) might face more IRS questions under the new regime. 
  
  Treaty-based positions should be thoroughly supported by contemporaneous evidence (residency certificates, proof of foreign tax paid, etc.). 
  
  Likewise, first-year and last-year residency cases may see heightened IRS scrutiny – e.g., if someone claims to have left the U.S. for good in June, the IRS may more often request proof of foreign residence for the remainder of the year. It’s advisable to document travel dates and foreign ties more rigorously in anticipation of this stricter oversight.

Bottom line. The residency definitions (substantial presence test, green card test, etc.) are unchanged – no new “residency tie-breaker certificate” or election was created in OBBBA (the mooted RBT proposal would have allowed citizens to elect non-resident status, but it’s not law). 

So the familiar complexities of dual-status returns and treaty tie-breakers remain. 

The difference post-OBBBA is a less forgiving compliance atmosphere. 

Entry and exit dates should be carefully planned, to maximize the use of any available exclusions/credits in split years, and ensure all required statements (e.g., dual-status statement, treaty disclosure) are properly attached to returns. 

Given the new law’s emphasis on enforcement, taking meticulous care with these cases will be critical.

Conclusion

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 brings a mix of tax cuts, new rules, and tightened compliance that expats must navigate. 

For inbound expats, there’s relief in the form of permanent lower tax rates and higher credits, but also the loss of any moving expense offset and a new remittance tax to consider. 

For outbound Americans, the status quo of worldwide taxation continues – mitigated by an even larger FEIE and FTC preservation – but accompanied by more reporting obligations and potential penalties. 

Notably, the “worst-case” provisions feared by expats (like the Section 899 FTC surtax) were averted, making this law, in some ways, less punitive than expected. 

In fact, some experts call it expat-friendly due to the higher exclusions and the groundwork laid for future residence-based reform.

Still, the administrative burden on expats will rise. More forms (FBAR, FATCA, 3520) at lower thresholds, stricter timelines, and vigorous enforcement mean taxpayers must be ever diligent. 

There are also subtle planning points – from exploiting the temporarily generous estate exclusion, to adjusting tax equalization policies for employers, to revisiting whether FEIE or FTC yields a better outcome under the new rates. 

Each expat’s scenario will be unique under OBBBA, so personalized analysis is key.

IRS/Treasury Guidance. As of mid-2025, the IRS has begun issuing guidance on implementing OBBBA’s provisions. 

For example, guidance was promised on the new tip and overtime deductions (with transition relief for 2025 reporting), and we anticipate further instructions on international provisions (e.g. how to apply the new excise tax or any changes in reporting thresholds).

In summary, expat taxation in the post-OBBBA era will require careful attention but also presents new opportunities. 

By understanding the law’s changes – higher deductions and credits, preserved exclusions, and new compliance rules – inbound and outbound taxpayers alike can minimize their tax liability while staying fully compliant with both U.S. and foreign laws. 

The 2025 tax year will be a test run for many of these changes, so proactive planning in late 2025 and early 2026 will be essential. 

With thoughtful planning, Americans abroad and foreign nationals in the U.S. can navigate the One Big Beautiful Bill’s provisions to their advantage, or at least avoid its pitfalls, and move forward with greater confidence in their tax positions.

If you’re an Australian living in the United States, taxes can seem daunting. But knowing whether you’re a resident or nonresident alien—and understanding what that means for your tax situation—is simpler than you think. 

Here’s a straightforward guide to clarify your tax obligations in the U.S.

Who Are You In The Eyes Of The IRS?

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) categorizes people living in the U.S. into two main groups:

• U.S. Persons (citizens, green card holders, or individuals meeting the substantial presence test)
• Foreign Persons (nonresident aliens)

How Do I Know If I’m A Resident Alien?

If you’re not a U.S. citizen but live or work in the U.S., you’re either a resident alien or a nonresident alien for tax purposes. The distinction matters a lot:

• Resident Alien: You’re taxed similarly to a U.S. citizen, meaning you’re required to report and pay taxes on your global income.
• Nonresident Alien: You’re taxed only on income sourced from the U.S.

You become a resident alien if you pass one of two tests:

1. Green Card Test: If you have permanent residency (a “green card”), you’re automatically a resident alien.
2. Substantial Presence Test: If you spend at least 31 days of the current year in the U.S., and a total of 183 days during the past three years (calculated by a special formula), you’re a resident alien.

Certain visas, like student (F, J, M, Q) or teaching visas, have special rules—these days may not count towards residency, at least initially.

Resident Alien Taxes: Reporting Worldwide Income

If you’re a resident alien, you must:

• Declare your global income, including income earned outside the U.S.
• Use standard U.S. tax forms (usually Form 1040 or 1040-SR).

The good news is you may qualify for tax relief through:

• Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (Form 2555): Excludes up to a certain amount of foreign income.
• Foreign Tax Credit (Form 1116): Reduces double taxation by crediting taxes paid to foreign governments.

Key Tax Forms For Resident Aliens

Here are common tax forms you’ll likely encounter:

• Form 1040 or 1040-SR: U.S. Individual Income Tax Return
• Form 4868: Application for Automatic Extension (extends filing, but not payment deadlines)
• Form 2555: Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
• Form 1116: Foreign Tax Credit
• Schedule B, C, D, E: Reporting various income types (interest, business income, capital gains, etc.)
• FinCEN Form 114 (FBAR): Reporting foreign bank accounts
• Form 8938 (FATCA): Reporting specified foreign assets

Nonresident Alien Taxes: Paying Only On U.S. – Sourced Income

As a nonresident alien, your tax obligations differ:

• You only pay taxes on U.S.-sourced income.
• Income is classified as either:
  • Effectively Connected Income (ECI): Tied to active U.S. trade or business, taxed at graduated rates similar to U.S. residents.
  • Non-Effectively Connected Income: Usually taxed at a flat 30% (or lower treaty rate) and includes passive income like dividends and royalties.

Tax Forms For Nonresident Aliens

Nonresident aliens typically file:

• Form 1040-NR: U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return
• Form 8843: For exempt individuals (students or trainees)
• Form W-7: Application for an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN)

When Are My Taxes Due?

• Resident Aliens: Generally due by April 15th each year. Extensions are available until October 15th if requested by April 15th (Form 4868).
• Nonresident Aliens:
  • Employees (subject to withholding): Due April 15th.
  • Others (not employees or without withholding): Due June 15th.
  • Extensions available (also via Form 4868).

Special Situations & Extensions

• Out of the Country? You automatically receive a two-month extension to June 15th if your primary residence or business is outside the U.S. Additional extensions (up to December 15th) are available upon request.

Important: Tax Treaties & Exceptions

Australia and the U.S. have a tax treaty to prevent double taxation. If applicable, you must:

• File Form 8833 to disclose treaty-based positions.
• Understand treaty specifics, which could lower withholding rates and reduce tax burdens.

Penalties And Compliance

Non-filing or late filing can incur penalties and interest charges. Green card holders who do not file tax returns risk losing their U.S. residency status.

It’s critical to stay compliant with all forms and filing deadlines to avoid unnecessary penalties.

Help When You Need It

Navigating the complexities of U.S. taxes as an Australian expat can be challenging – it is highly recommended you seek the services of a qualified CPA who understands expat taxes. 

If you’re planning to relocate permanently from Australia to the United States, understanding how your assets will be taxed is crucial. Whether you own shares, rental properties, or other investments, both countries have complex tax rules that may apply. Proper planning helps ensure you’re not taxed twice on the same gain.

What Happens To Your Asset Values When You Move To The U.S.?

Important: Contrary to what many assume, the United States does not automatically reset or “step-up” the tax value (basis) of your assets when you become a U.S. tax resident. Instead, your original purchase price typically remains the basis for calculating your future U.S. taxes. This means you may face U.S. taxes on gains that occurred even before moving to America.

Example (Shares):

Say you bought shares in a major Australian bank years ago for AUD $30,000. By the time you relocate to the U.S., they are worth AUD $150,000. Later, as a U.S. tax resident, you sell them for AUD $180,000. Without special planning, the U.S. taxes you on a gain of AUD $150,000 (AUD $180,000 minus your original AUD $30,000 purchase price)—even though most of that appreciation occurred while you lived in Australia.

Australia’s Exit Tax: What Is It?

When you cease Australian tax residency, Australia imposes a tax on your worldwide capital assets, treating most as if you’ve sold them at their current market value (Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, section 104-160). This “exit tax” effectively taxes your accumulated gain up to that point.

Example (Shares Continued):

At departure, your shares valued at AUD $150,000 (original cost AUD $30,000) would trigger Australian Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on the AUD $120,000 gain immediately—even though you haven’t actually sold them.

Risk Of Double Taxation

If no special steps are taken, you face paying tax twice:

• First – Australia taxes your AUD $120,000 gain at the time you leave.
• Later – The U.S. taxes the entire AUD $150,000 gain when you sell the shares, including the AUD $120,000 already taxed by Australia.

Clearly, this is not ideal. Fortunately, the U.S.-Australia Tax Treaty provides two valuable solutions.

Solution #1: The Treaty Basis Step-Up (Paying Australian Exit Tax)

Under Article 13(5) of the U.S.-Australia tax treaty, you can elect to treat your assets as sold and immediately repurchased at their market value at the time you cease Australian residency, effectively “stepping up” your basis for U.S. tax purposes.

Example (Shares):

Using the treaty election, your U.S. tax basis for the shares is reset to AUD $150,000—the market value at your departure from Australia. Later, when you sell these shares in the U.S. for AUD $180,000, you pay U.S. tax only on the AUD $30,000 gain accrued after moving. This prevents double taxation, as the pre-move AUD $120,000 gain was already taxed by Australia.

Solution #2: Deferring Australia’s Exit Tax (Exclusive U.S. Taxation)

Australia offers an alternative: you may defer the immediate payment of the exit tax (ITAA 1997, section 104-165). Instead of paying tax upfront, you defer taxation until the actual sale of your assets. Under normal circumstances, this deferred asset would remain taxable by Australia.

However, Article 13(6) of the U.S.-Australia treaty states that if you move to the U.S. and defer Australian exit tax, Australia relinquishes its right to tax that gain, granting exclusive taxing rights to the U.S.

Example (Shares With Deferral):

You defer the Australian exit tax on your shares. Several years later, as a U.S. resident, you sell these shares for AUD $180,000. Australia no longer has the right to tax this gain. Only the U.S. will tax you, applying tax to the full AUD $150,000 gain (original AUD $30,000 cost basis to AUD $180,000 sale price).

This approach gives you cash-flow flexibility at departure (no immediate tax payable), and you may benefit if U.S. tax rates are lower.

How These Rules Impact Different Types Of Assets – Practical Examples

Example 1: Rental Property

Suppose you bought a Sydney apartment as an investment property 10 years ago for AUD $500,000. It’s now worth AUD $1,200,000. You relocate to the U.S. permanently:

Example 2: Portfolio Of International Shares

Suppose you invested AUD $100,000 into global shares now worth AUD $400,000 when you leave Australia for the U.S.:

• Australian Treatment At Exit
  Australia taxes the AUD $300,000 gain immediately (shares aren’t Australian property, so they face immediate exit tax).
• U.S. Without Treaty Step-Up
  Later selling at AUD $450,000, U.S. taxes AUD $350,000 (AUD $450,000 sale price less original AUD $100,000 cost), again double-taxing most of the gain.
• With Treaty Step-Up
  By electing the treaty basis step-up, your U.S. tax basis is reset to AUD $400,000. Selling later at AUD $450,000, the U.S. only taxes AUD $50,000, preventing double taxation on pre-move gains.

Example 3: Shares In Your Australian Business

You founded a small Australian business, investing AUD $200,000 initially. By relocation time, it’s worth AUD $1,000,000.

• Australian Treatment
  Australia imposes exit tax on your AUD $800,000 gain at departure, unless you defer.
• U.S. Without Treaty Step-Up
  Selling later at AUD $1,200,000, the U.S. taxes AUD $1,000,000 (full gain from initial AUD $200,000), causing double taxation on AUD $800,000 already taxed by Australia.
• With Treaty Step-Up
  Treaty election resets your U.S. basis to AUD $1,000,000. Selling later for AUD $1,200,000, you only pay U.S. tax on AUD $200,000, protecting you from double taxation.

How To Make A Treaty Election?

To claim this valuable treaty-based step-up, you’ll typically file IRS Form 8833 (Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure) with your first U.S. tax return as a resident, clearly electing the treaty basis step-up under Article 13(5).

Key Points To Remember

• The U.S. generally does not reset your tax basis on relocation.
• Australia’s exit tax rules may cause double taxation if ignored.
• The U.S.-Australia tax treaty offers a treaty-based step-up or exclusive taxing right to the U.S., protecting you from double tax.
• Proper planning is essential. Evaluate your choices carefully, ideally with professional advice, to choose the best strategy for your situation.

Understanding these tax implications early helps you confidently and efficiently transition your financial life from Australia to the U.S.

For Australian expatriates residing in the United States, inheriting property, shares, or cash from Australia involves several important tax considerations. 

While Australia does not have an inheritance tax – the U.S. has an estate tax that could potentially apply under certain circumstances. 

Additionally, the tax treatment of inherited assets differs between the two countries, particularly concerning capital gains tax (CGT) in Australia and income tax obligations in the U.S.

This article provides a detailed, accurate guide to understanding:

• How the U.S. and Australia treat inheritances
• The correct cost base rules for inherited assets in Australia
• What taxes you need to consider when selling or earning income from inherited assets
• Key reporting requirements for expats receiving an inheritance from Australia

Let’s dive in.

Understanding U.S. Estate Tax And The 1953 U.S.-Australia Estate Tax Treaty

Unlike Australia, the United States has an estate tax, which applies to the total value of a deceased person’s U.S.-situated estate. 

However, the “Convention Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Estates of Deceased Persons” (1953 U.S.-Australia Estate Tax Treaty) provides certain protections for Australian expats.

How U.S. Estate Tax Applies To Australian Expats

 If You Inherit Assets From Australia

• No U.S. estate tax applies when you inherit property, shares, or cash from an Australian estate.
• However, once you own the asset, any future income, dividends, or capital gains from selling the asset will be taxable in the U.S.

If You Own U.S. Assets When You Die

• U.S. estate tax applies to U.S.-situs assets (e.g., real estate, U.S. stocks, U.S. businesses).
• The 1953 U.S.-Australia Estate Tax Treaty allows Australians to claim the same U.S. estate tax exemption as U.S. citizens.
• In 2024, the U.S. estate tax exemption is $13.61 million—meaning no U.S. estate tax applies if your worldwide estate is below this amount.

If your worldwide estate exceeds this threshold, U.S. estate tax could apply at rates of up to 40%.

Key Takeaways

1. If you inherit assets from an Australian estate, the U.S. does not impose estate tax on you.
2. If you own U.S. assets when you die, your estate could be taxed—but only if your worldwide estate exceeds $13.61 million.
3. The 1953 treaty protects Australians from double taxation on estate matters.

Inheriting Property In Australia While Living In The U.S.

Australian Tax Implications: Capital Gains Tax (CGT) On Sale

While inheriting property itself is tax-free, Australia imposes capital gains tax (CGT) when you sell the inherited property. 

The rules for calculating the cost base (original value for tax purposes) depend on when the deceased acquired the property.

Correct Cost Base Rules For Inherited Property In Australia

When the Deceased Acquired the Property	Your Cost Base
Before 20 September 1985 (pre-CGT asset)	The market value of the property on the date of the deceased’s death.
Before 20 September 1985, but a major improvement was made on/after that date	The market value of the original asset + the cost base of the improvement at the date of death.
On or after 20 September 1985 (post-CGT asset)	The deceased’s cost base at the date of death, unless:  The property was the deceased’s main residence and not used to generate income before death, in which case the cost base is reset to market value at the date of death.

When The Deceased Acquired The Property	Your Cost Base
Special disability trust property	The cost base is the market value at the date of death.

Selling Inherited Property & Australian CGT

If you sell the property within two years, you may qualify for a CGT exemption (if the deceased’s main residence was not used for rental income).

If the property was an investment property, CGT applies based on the correct cost base.

U.S. Tax Implications

No U.S. tax applies when you inherit the property.

However if you sell the property, the IRS will tax the capital gain, but you can claim a foreign tax credit for Australian CGT to avoid double taxation.

If you rent out the property, you must report rental income in the U.S. and may owe tax.

Inheriting Shares In Australia While Living In The U.S.

Australian Tax Implications

• No tax is due at the time of inheritance.
• If the deceased acquired the shares before 20 September 1985, the cost base is  the market value at the date of death.
• If the deceased acquired the shares on or after 20 September 1985, your cost base is the deceased’s cost base at the date of death.

U.S. Tax Implications

• No U.S. tax applies to the inheritance itself.
• Any dividends from Australian shares are taxable in the U.S. as foreign income.
• When you sell the shares, you must report the capital gain to the IRS.
• If you pay Australian CGT, you can claim a foreign tax credit in the U.S.

Inheriting Cash In Australia While Living In The U.S.

Australian Tax Implications

No tax applies to inherited cash in Australia.

U.S. Tax Implications

• No U.S. tax applies to the inheritance itself.
• If you receive over USD $100,000 from a foreign inheritance, you must file IRS Form 3520.
• Failing to file Form 3520 can result in penalties of $10,000 or more.

U.S. Reporting Requirements For Australian Inheritances

Form	Who Needs to File?	What It Reports
FBAR (FinCEN Form 114)	If foreign financial accounts exceed $10,000	Foreign bank accounts, superannuation, shareholdings
Form 8938	If foreign assets exceed $50,000 (single) or $100,000 (joint)	Foreign financial assets, including shares
Form 3520	If you inherit $100,000+ in a single year	Reporting large foreign inheritances to the IRS

Final Takeaways: What You Need To Know About Inheritance As An Australian Expat In The U.S.

• No U.S. estate tax applies to inheritances from Australia due to the 1953 U.S.-Australia Estate Tax Treaty.
• Australia has no inheritance tax, but CGT applies when selling inherited property or shares.
• The correct cost base for inherited Australian assets depends on when the deceased acquired them.
• Rental income and dividends from Australian assets must be reported in the U.S.
• If you receive more than $100,000, you must file IRS Form 3520 to report it.
• Foreign tax credits can help prevent double taxation on asset sales.

The above is a general overview of inheritance considerations for Australians living in the US. There may be nuances in your personal circumstances that may need specific tax advice. It is important you obtain individual advice specific to your situation.

Moving to the United States as an Australian expat is an exciting step, but it also comes with a range of financial and tax implications that can be confusing. 

One of the most significant concerns we encounter for Australians relocating to the U.S. is how their Australian superannuation is treated. Unlike other investments, superannuation has unique tax and reporting requirements that can significantly impact your financial position.

This article explores how your Australian superannuation is treated in the U.S., the disclosures and forms you need to file, the consequences of contributing to super while living in the U.S., and what happens when you access your super while residing in America.

How Is Your Australian Superannuation Treated In The U.S.?

Superannuation is a cornerstone of retirement planning for Australians, but once you move to the U.S., its classification under American tax law becomes complicated. 

The main challenge arises from the fact that the U.S. does not recognize Australian superannuation as a tax-deferred retirement account like a U.S. 401(k) or IRA. Instead, the U.S. views superannuation in one of two ways:

1. Foreign Trust – The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may consider your super fund as a foreign grantor trust, subjecting it to complex U.S. tax and reporting requirements. This classification may lead to additional tax liabilities, particularly when earnings inside the super fund are realized.
   
2. Foreign Pension – In some cases, the superannuation fund may be classified as a foreign pension, which can offer a more favorable tax treatment. However, there is no definitive IRS guidance on this, leading to inconsistent application of tax rules.

Taxation Of Superannuation In The U.S.

Regardless of its classification, the U.S. generally taxes superannuation in ways that differ from Australian tax laws. While contributions and earnings may grow tax-free in Australia, the U.S. may tax contributions, earnings, and distributions differently. Key considerations include:

• Employer Contributions: Employer contributions to your super fund may be considered taxable income in the U.S. in the year they are made.
  
• Investment Earnings: Earnings within your superannuation fund, such as dividends and capital gains, may be subject to annual U.S. taxation, even if they are not distributed.
  
• Withdrawals and Distributions: The tax treatment of superannuation withdrawals varies, but in many cases, distributions may be taxed in the U.S. as ordinary income, even if they are tax-free in Australia.

The range of outcomes noted above depends on the type of superannuation fund you have.

Self Managed Superannuation Funds

For expats in the USA that have a ‘Self-Managed Superannuation Fund’ urgent attention is needed toward restructuring your Superannuation Fund BEFORE you move to the USA.

Remaining the Trustee of an Australian Superannuation Fund after you move to the US – even inadvertently – causes a number of serious tax issues both in Australia (not the focus of this article) and the USA.

One of the major issues is that you are personally taxable on the income of the Australian Self-Managed Superannuation Fund as it arises. This can add materially to your USA tax bill and should be avoided.

What Disclosures And Forms Do You Need To File?

As an Australian expat living in the U.S., you must comply with stringent reporting requirements related to your superannuation. 

Failure to do so can result in significant penalties. Some of the key forms and disclosures include:

1. FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report) – FinCEN Form 114
   • If the total value of your non-U.S. financial accounts (including superannuation) exceeds $10,000 at any time during the year, you must file an FBAR.
   • Superannuation accounts are generally considered foreign financial accounts and should be included in the FBAR filing.
2. Form 8938 (Statement Of Specified Foreign Financial Assets)
   • If the total value of your foreign financial assets (including superannuation) exceeds certain thresholds ($50,000 for single filers, $100,000 for married filers living in the U.S.), you must file Form 8938 with your tax return.
   • This form is in addition to the FBAR and provides the IRS with detailed information about your foreign financial accounts.
3. Form 3520 (Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts)
   • If your superannuation is classified as a foreign trust, you may need to file Form 3520 to report contributions and distributions.
4. Form 8621 (Passive Foreign Investment Company – PFIC) Reporting
   • If your superannuation fund holds certain types of investments (e.g., managed funds), you may have to file Form 8621 to report Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) income.

Consequences Of Contributing To Super While Living In The U.S.

If you continue making superannuation contributions while residing in the U.S., you may face unintended tax consequences:

• U.S. Tax on Contributions: Since the U.S. does not recognize super contributions as tax-deferred, employer contributions may be taxable to you in the year they are made.
• Double Taxation Risks: While contributions may be tax-free in Australia, they may be taxable in the U.S., leading to double taxation.
• Compliance Burden: Additional contributions increase the complexity of reporting and could result in higher U.S. tax compliance costs.
• Potential Loss of Benefits: Depending on how your super fund is classified, additional contributions could subject you to PFIC rules, leading to unfavorable tax treatment.

What Happens When You Can Access Your Super And Are Living In The U.S.?

When you reach preservation age and become eligible to withdraw your superannuation, you must consider how the U.S. will treat these withdrawals:

• Australian Tax Treatment – In Australia, lump-sum withdrawals from super after the age of 60 are typically tax-free.
• U.S. Tax Treatment – The U.S. may treat these withdrawals as taxable income, potentially subjecting them to ordinary income tax rates.
• Foreign Tax Credits – You may be able to offset some U.S. tax liability by claiming foreign tax credits, but this depends on the tax treaty’s applicability and how your super is classified.
• State Taxes – If you live in a U.S. state that imposes income tax, super withdrawals may also be subject to state taxation.

Strategies For Managing Your Super As A U.S. Based Expat

To minimize your tax burden and compliance obligations, consider the following strategies:

1. Pause Contributions While In The U.S.
   • Avoid making new contributions to super to prevent triggering additional U.S. tax and reporting obligations.
2. Review Your Super Investments
   • Assess whether your super fund contains investments subject to PFIC rules, and consider adjusting your investment mix.
3. Work With A Tax Professional
   • Given the complexity of superannuation taxation in the U.S., consult a tax advisor experienced in cross-border taxation.
4. Plan For Withdrawals
   • If you intend to withdraw super in the future, explore tax-efficient withdrawal strategies to minimize your U.S. tax liability.

Key Takeaways For Australians Living In The USA With Superannuation

Navigating superannuation as an Australian expat in the U.S. is challenging due to differing tax treatments and complex reporting requirements. 

Understanding how your super is classified, ensuring compliance with U.S. tax laws, and proactively planning for contributions and withdrawals can help you avoid unnecessary tax burdens. 

Given the nuances of cross-border tax regulations, seeking advice from an international tax firm is essential to optimize your financial situation while living in the U.S.

By staying informed and proactive, you can ensure that your superannuation remains a valuable asset for your retirement, regardless of where you reside.

Managing taxes can be challenging, particularly when living overseas. 

Many Australian expats in the USA wonder, “What happens with taxes on Australian shares I still own back home?”

If you’re an Australian expat in the USA, there are a few things to know about the tax implications of holding Australian shares. 

You may already be aware of how the franking credit system in Australia works and how tax credits are tied to dividends. 

However, the US doesn’t have an equivalent system. 

Here’s how taxes on your shares work when you’re a US tax resident.

What It Means To Be A US Tax Resident

Let’s assume you’ve moved to the USA and are now a US tax resident. 

When you lived in Australia, you paid tax on all your worldwide income. 

Now, as a US tax resident, you’ll only need to pay Australian taxes on assets with a direct link to Australia.

However, the USA also taxes worldwide income, so income from both Australian and US sources must be reported. US tax rates vary by income type—ordinary income, capital gains, and qualified dividends, each with its own rate.

Owning Australian Shares

If you own shares in Australian companies, here’s how taxes apply to dividend income from those shares.

• Franked Dividends: In Australia, franking credits are added to dividends to reduce double taxation. For expats, these credits usually cover Australian taxes, so you won’t pay additional Australian taxes on franked dividends. However, no tax refund is provided for these credits, even though they offset your Australian tax obligation.
• Unfranked Dividends: Unfranked dividends don’t come with franking credits, so they’re taxed differently. Under the Australia/USA tax agreement, Australia caps the tax on unfranked dividends for US residents at 15%. Be sure to notify the share company that you’re a non-resident so they can apply the correct withholding tax; otherwise, you may need to report it later your tax return.
• Reporting in the USA: The USA considers dividends from Australian shares as taxable income. However, you may be able to claim the franking credit or tax withholding as a foreign tax credit, which reduces your US tax bill.

Inheriting Australian Shares

Australia doesn’t have an inheritance tax. So, when you inherit shares, they’re either valued based on their market price on the date of death or the original cost base paid for the asset. It depends on when the asset was acquired by the deceased. This amount becomes your “cost base,” which you’ll use later to calculate any capital gains tax if you sell the shares.

In the US, while beneficiaries aren’t directly taxed on inherited assets, an estate tax could apply to the estate if it’s large enough. The fair market value on the date of inheritance serves as your cost base for capital gains. 

Buying & Selling Australian Shares

Purchasing shares in Australia as a non-resident doesn’t trigger any immediate tax consequences. In usual cases non-residents don’t pay tax on the sale of Australian listed shares.

There is a narrow category of share sales that would be taxable in Australia, however. Generally, these relate to shares in companies that have Australian real estate.

The US imposes a capital gains tax, with different rates for long-term and short-term holdings. You may claim the Australian tax paid as a credit against any US tax due on the same capital gain to avoid double taxation.

Understanding Double Taxation

Australia and the USA have a tax agreement to prevent double taxation. 

This means that while you’ll need to report your income in both countries, you can usually apply tax credits for Australian taxes paid against your US taxes on the same income.

Using The Check The Box Election To Simplify Tax Treatment

For Australian expats with ownership stakes in Australian companies or entities, the Check the Box Election can offer significant tax flexibility and may simplify your US tax obligations.

The Check the Box election is a choice US taxpayers can make to treat an Australian business entity (such as a private company) as either a corporation or a pass-through entity for US tax purposes. 

If you choose to treat the company as a “disregarded entity” (for a single-member entity) or a partnership (for a multi-member entity), the income flows directly to you as the individual taxpayer. 

This may allow you to avoid some of the more complex reporting and potentially double-taxation issues that can arise with foreign corporate ownership.

However, if you opt to treat the Australian company as a corporation, it will be taxed separately, which can sometimes be advantageous but will introduce reporting requirements (such as filing Form 5471). 

Please consult with us further so we can better advise you of your position.

Holding Shares Through a Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC)

If your shares are held through a Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC), special US tax rules apply, which could increase your tax bill. 

The IRS defines a PFIC as a foreign corporation earning mostly passive income or holding mostly passive income assets.

US shareholders of a PFIC may face complex tax rules. 

To reduce tax, you might consider specific elections like the Qualified Electing Fund (QEF) or mark-to-market options, but these require filing IRS Form 8621.

Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) Rules

Under CFC rules, the US may tax you on undistributed income if you own a significant stake in a foreign corporation. If, along with other US taxpayers, you own more than 50% of an Australian company, the company may qualify as a CFC, requiring you to report certain types of income in the US.

Seek Professional Advice

International tax can be complex, and tax rules change often. It’s wise to speak with a CST tax advisor as we provide advice in both US and Australian tax advice.

Whether you have already moved to the United States or are planning to, there are tax implications for Australian expats to consider. 

For example, how does the Australia-US tax treaty apply to capital gains on the realization of assets, and what will your Australian and US tax obligations be? 

These are just a few questions this article will answer for you.

What Is Capital Gains Tax?

To begin, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of capital gains tax concerning Australian expats. 

Capital Gains Tax or CGT is a tax on the profit made from selling an item classified as an asset. In Australia, as in the United States, CGT is complex and different from other taxes. Let us review both Australian and US CGT and then bring them together.

Australian CGT Tax

In Australia, CGT applies to any asset acquired after 20 September 1985. 

Selling an asset for more than it costs means you have a capital gain and must pay CGT. If an asset is sold for less than it cost, this results in a capital loss that can offset against current or future capital gains.

Generally, if an Australian tax resident makes a capital gain and the asset sold was held for at least 12 months, the 50% capital gain tax discount will apply. This results in half the capital gain being included in assessable income and being assessed at marginal rates of tax – which may vary between financial years. See the ATO website for the current individual tax rates. 

There are potential exemptions from the capital gains tax regime, including the main residence exemption.

A person’s main residence, which was moved into as soon as practicable after purchase and continues to be a person’s main residence for the entire ownership period, and on sale, if still a tax resident of Australia, will be exempt from CGT.

In relation to the main residence exemption, new laws passed in 2019, which came into effect 1 July 2020 now mean a total loss of this exemption if the property is sold while the taxpayer is a non-resident of Australia. There are some exceptions known as life events but careful planning is required to ensure the preservation of this exemption.

US CGT Tax

Under US law, the tax rate applied to capital gains depends on the asset’s holding period.

For assets held more than a year, you pay long-term capital gains tax, usually lower than the tax on ordinary income.

For assets held for less than a year, short-term capital gains tax rates apply, equal to your normal income tax rate.

Your income also determines the percentage of CGT you pay in the United States.

Your US CGT rate will depend on your taxable income. It is best to check the IRS website for the most current income thresholds for which CGT rate applies. 

There are also special circumstances under which your capital gains might be taxed at a higher rate. For example, net capital gains from selling collectibles (such as coins or art) are taxed at a maximum 28% rate.

Australia-US Tax Treaty And Its Impact On Capital Gains Tax

For Australian expats in the US, the Australia-US Tax Treaty is particularly important to understand. First signed into law in 1982, the treaty has been updated several times since then to address changes in areas such as superannuation and non-US investments.  

The Australia-US Tax Treaty determines where your tax obligations lie between the two countries. The overarching goal of the treaty is “avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income.” 

As we explain in this article, the Australia-US Tax Treaty, allows the tax paid in one jurisdiction to be claimed as a tax credit in the other jurisdiction, in the event that the income is assessable in both.  

For example, if the US sourced income is first taxed in the US and the income is then assessed in Australia, the tax first paid in the US will be taken up as a foreign tax credit against the tax assessed on the income. If the foreign tax credit covers the Australian tax, then any excess foreign tax credits are lost. If there is a shortfall after the foreign tax credit is applied to the assessed Australian tax, then extra tax will be required to be paid.

Tax Obligations When Selling A Former Main Residence In Australia

Let us look at an example to demonstrate how the Australia-US Tax Treaty affects Australian expats when selling their former main residence. 

An Australian couple moves to the US and lives there for eight years. They have decided to sell their former main home in Australia (purchased in 2015 for AUD1,000,000 and now worth AUD3,000,000).

Australian Tax Considerations

This couple would be classified as foreign residents and would not qualify for the CGT main residence exemption. As such, they will pay Australian CGT tax on the AUD2,000,000 (AUD3,000,000-AUD1,000,000) capital gain. 

However, if this Australian couple moves back to Australia and are considered residents for tax purposes and they reestablish the home as their main residence, depending on the length of their absence from Australia and whether they rented the property out or left it vacant, will determine whether a full or partial main residence exemption exists.

This example makes it clear that planning the timing of the sale of your former primary residence can and will have material tax implications. With that in mind, it is critical to get professional tax advice to optimize any potential or upcoming CGT liabilities.

It is important to note Australia also offers certain life event exemptions if they occurred during the time this family lived abroad, which could make them eligible for the CGT main residence exemption. 

The life events this includes are:

• You, your spouse, or your child under 18 had a terminal medical condition
• Your spouse or your child under 18 died
• The CGT event happened because of a formal agreement following the breakdown of your marriage or relationship

USA Tax Considerations

Any income earned, including employment income and realized capital gains, is subject to US tax. Australians who have become US tax residents, including green card holders and those in the US for over 183 days in the last two years, are taxed on worldwide income. This would include the AUD2,000,000 capital gain.

However, the U.S. allows a foreign tax credit for U.S. residents on US taxes owed against any tax already paid to Australia or vice versa. 

The Australia-US Tax Treaty requires that the combined taxes paid in both countries cannot exceed the total tax that would otherwise have been payable in the country where the sale occurs.

Australia And USA Combined Tax Considerations

If the Australian couple decided to sell their former main residence in Australia while being a non-resident for tax purposes, they will need to declare this income on both the Australian and US income tax return. 

As the property is situated in Australia, the first taxing rights reside with Australia. Tax will be applied at non-resident marginal rates on their AUD2,000,000 capital gain.  

For the US CGT, the tax on their AUD2,000,000 capital gain would be calculated depending on their combined income and the CGT rate applicable. 

Thankfully, this couple would not have to pay both the full amount of tax in Australia and the US, as the tax treaty allows taxpayers in each jurisdiction to avoid double taxation. In this case as Australia has the first taxing rights, the US would give the couple a tax credit for the tax paid in Australia and the excess tax paid will be carried forward.

CGT On Selling Shares Originally Purchased In Australia

Let us assume an Australian citizen moves to the US for a period of five years. During this time, they decided to sell the shares purchased while they resided in Australia.

The first aspect to consider is what their choice was when then became a non-resident of Australia. If an Australian tax resident moves to the US and becomes a non-resident and they hold a share portfolio, the choices on cessation of residency with respect to the share portfolio is either to take a deemed disposal or ignore the deemed disposal and treat the shares as Taxable Australian Property. 

A deemed disposal involves comparing the purchase price of the shares to the market value of the shares on the date that residency ceased. Importantly, there is no cash received with respect to this type of CGT happening and so if there is a large accumulated capital gain, then there will be a tax bill that requires payment from other funds. 

If the latter option is chosen (ie. they choose to treat the shares as Taxable Australian Property), any future sale of these shares are connected with Australia and a capital gain or capital loss requires calculation and reporting in the Australian income tax return, even as a non-resident.

Fortunately, the treaty provides a paragraph where future sales of this portfolio can be subject to tax solely in the US. If a choice is made to have future sales subject to tax solely in the US, then the deemed disposal on cessation of residency is ignored.

CGT On Inheritance In Australia

If an Australian citizen has lived in the US for 15 years and inherits an investment property and shares, what are the tax implications in both Australia and the US?

Inheriting Property

The original property was purchased for AUD500,000 and has a current market value of AUD2,500,000. If the property was sold on when inherited, there will be a capital gain of AUD2,000,000 (AUD2,500,000-AUD500,000). As Australia has the first taxing rights, tax will be applied at non-resident rates.

If they had no other Australian sourced income for the year in which the property was sold, tax on the capital gain of AUD2,000,000 would be AUD875,350.

The USA CGT tax on their AUD2,000,000 capital gain would be calculated depending on their combined income and the CGT rate applicable.

The Australian citizen would not have to pay both the AUD875,350 Australian CGT and US CGT as the treaty allows taxpayers in each jurisdiction to avoid double taxation. In this case, the US would give the person a tax credit totaling AUD875,350.

Inheriting Shares

If they inherit shares, they can choose to have any future sales solely taxed in the US under the Australia-US Treaty.

Get Help Navigating CGT For Australian Expats

There are many intricacies and challenges to navigating tax laws between countries. The information in this article may not cover some variables relevant to your circumstances and as such it is recommended you seek tax advice for your specific situation.

The U.S. government’s crackdown on offshore tax evasion has placed the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) in the spotlight. Many U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts may not fully understand their obligation to disclose these accounts, and even fewer realize the severe penalties that come with failing to comply. For U.S. citizens, residents, and entities with foreign financial accounts, the stakes are high.

Understanding FBAR requirements and the line between non-willful and willful violations, including recklessness, can mean the difference between a reasonable penalty or a financial disaster. A key case illustrating this legal battlefield is Bedrosian v. United States, a cautionary tale for those who might be unaware—or choose to remain unaware—of their filing obligations.

FBAR Reporting Requirements And Penalties: An Overview

U.S. citizens, residents, and certain entities are required to file an FBAR if the aggregate value of their foreign accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point during the calendar year. This requirement applies even if the accounts don’t generate taxable income. The FBAR is filed annually with FinCEN, separate from tax returns.

Penalties for failing to comply are steep:

• Non-Willful Violations: Penalties for non-willful violations are generally capped at $10,000 per violation unless the taxpayer can show reasonable cause.
• Willful Violations: For willful violations, penalties can be far more significant, often up to 50% of the account balance or $100,000, whichever is greater. In some cases, criminal charges can also be brought.

The difference between willful and non-willful violations is central to determining penalties, and recent court cases and IRS guidance have clarified that recklessness can meet the standard for willful conduct.

Bedrosian Case: Recklessness Redefined

In Bedrosian v. United States, the issue of recklessness in the context of FBAR penalties took center stage. Arthur Bedrosian, a successful businessman from Pennsylvania, had held foreign accounts with UBS in Switzerland. Despite being aware of his FBAR obligations, he failed to report one of his accounts in 2007. The IRS imposed a $975,789 penalty, citing willful failure to file.

Initially, the district court sided with Bedrosian, ruling that his actions were non-willful, and reduced the penalty to $10,000. However, on appeal, the 3rd Circuit Court found that the district court had applied an incorrect standard of willfulness, specifically underestimating the role of recklessness in FBAR violations. The 3rd Circuit clarified that recklessness can indeed qualify as willfulness, and remanded the case for further review. Upon reconsideration, the district court determined that Bedrosian’s failure to report the account demonstrated at least reckless disregard, and the original penalty was reinstated.

Key Case On Recklessness: McBride And FBAR Penalties

A landmark case discussing recklessness in FBAR violations is United States v. McBride. In this case, the taxpayer, Michael McBride, failed to file an FBAR for his offshore accounts. The court found that McBride acted with reckless disregard of the filing requirements, even though he claimed ignorance. The court emphasized that recklessness could be inferred from a taxpayer’s knowledge of the law and his failure to comply with it, even if there wasn’t a clear intent to break the law.

The McBride decision underscored that a taxpayer doesn’t need to knowingly violate FBAR obligations to be penalized severely. Acting recklessly—such as choosing not to learn the rules or ignoring clear indications that filing is required—can be sufficient to trigger the harshest penalties.

IRS’s Approach To Determining Willfulness: The Role Of Evidence

The IRS takes a broad approach when assessing whether an FBAR violation was willful or reckless. In doing so, the agency looks at various forms of evidence to determine whether a taxpayer’s failure to file was due to deliberate intent, recklessness, or negligence. Key factors include:

• Prior Filings And Disclosures: The IRS may review past tax returns and FBAR filings to assess whether the taxpayer has consistently disclosed foreign accounts. A pattern of non-disclosure could suggest willfulness.
• Foreign Bank Communications: Correspondence between the taxpayer and their foreign bank can provide clues about willfulness. For instance, if the bank warned the taxpayer about FBAR requirements, and they still failed to comply, this could indicate recklessness.
• Education and Background Of The Taxpayer: The IRS will also take into account the taxpayer’s background and sophistication. For instance, someone with a high level of financial literacy, such as a business owner or an individual working in finance, is more likely to be held to a higher standard of knowledge regarding their obligations. In Bedrosian, for example, his years of financial dealings and awareness of offshore accounts contributed to the court’s determination of recklessness.
• Taxpayer Behavior: Deliberate concealment, such as moving funds to different jurisdictions or closing accounts after learning of an investigation, can be viewed as willful.

The Internal Revenue Manual also provides guidelines for IRS examiners to follow when assessing willfulness. The IRS is particularly focused on patterns of behavior that demonstrate a conscious choice to disregard the law.

What Does This Mean For Taxpayers?

Taxpayers who hold foreign accounts must be aware of the serious consequences of failing to comply with FBAR requirements. The distinction between willful and non-willful violations is often determined by the taxpayer’s behavior and the totality of the circumstances, not just their direct knowledge of the law. The IRS will scrutinize the individual’s past filings, communications, and behavior to determine whether their failure to file was reckless or deliberate.

As seen in McBride and Bedrosian, recklessness doesn’t require overt intent to evade the law. Simply failing to act on information, or ignoring a known legal duty, can lead to penalties amounting to 50% of the account balance. The IRS’s focus on recklessness means that taxpayers cannot afford to be passive about their foreign accounts. They must actively ensure compliance or risk facing substantial financial penalties.

Conclusion

With the growing focus on offshore tax evasion, the U.S. government has ramped up its enforcement of FBAR penalties. The Bedrosian and McBride cases highlight the importance of understanding the broad definition of willfulness, which includes reckless conduct. Taxpayers who fail to disclose foreign accounts may face severe penalties, even if they claim ignorance. Staying informed and seeking expert advice is critical for anyone with international financial interests.

Declaring Foreign Business Interests

Navigating the U.S. tax code can feel like tiptoeing through a minefield, especially when you throw in international dealings. 

If you’re a U.S. person or corporation with foreign business interests, two forms in particular—Forms 5471 and 5472—might already haunt your dreams. 

Dubbed the “Terrible Twosome” by some beleaguered taxpayers, these forms come with stringent filing requirements and draconian penalties for non-compliance. 

Here’s why you should never forget to file these forms, what the consequences of forgetting are, and some recent developments that might surprise you.

What Are Forms 5471 And 5472?

Form 5471 is essentially an information return that must be filed by certain U.S. citizens and residents who are officers, directors, or shareholders in certain foreign corporations. 

The form requires detailed disclosure about the foreign corporation’s income, assets, and shareholders.

Form 5472 on the other hand, is used by U.S. corporations that are at least 25% foreign-owned, or by foreign corporations engaged in a U.S. trade or business. 

This form requires disclosure of reportable transactions between the reporting corporation and related foreign parties.

While both forms may seem like just another piece of paperwork, failure to file them—or filing them incorrectly—can lead to massive penalties.

The Fines:

Staggering and Unforgiving The IRS takes non-compliance with Forms 5471 and 5472 very seriously, with penalties that could make even the most seasoned tax veteran wince. 

For Form 5471 the penalty starts at $10,000 per year per foreign corporation. 

If the taxpayer fails to correct the omission within 90 days of being notified by the IRS, additional penalties of $10,000 accrue every 30 days, up to a maximum of $50,000. 

Form 5472 penalties are even harsher, starting at $25,000 for each accounting period the form is not filed. 

After the IRS sends a notice of failure, an additional $25,000 penalty kicks in for each subsequent 30-day period of non-compliance, with no cap on the penalties. 

These penalties apply whether the non-compliance was willful or due to an innocent mistake, although options for relief exist in cases of non-willful conduct. 

However, this relief is often difficult to obtain and requires demonstrating reasonable cause for the failure. 

No Statute Of Limitations? Yes, You Read That Right

One of the most terrifying aspects of failing to file these forms is that it can leave your entire tax return open to scrutiny indefinitely. 

Normally, the IRS has three years from the date you file your return to audit it. 

However, if you fail to file Forms 5471 or 5472, that statute of limitations does not apply. The IRS could theoretically go back and audit that return 10, 15, or 20 years later. 

Recent Developments: A Small Ray of Hope?

A recent Tax Court case, Farhy v. Commissioner, had thrown a wrench into the IRS’s penalty regime. 

In April 2023, the court ruled that the IRS did not have the statutory authority to assess penalties under Section 6038(b) for failing to file Form 5471. 

The IRS had been enforcing these penalties for years, but the court found that there was no legal basis for these assessments.

However this Tax Court Ruling was subsequently overturned by the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit on  3 May 2024.

Conclusion: Don’t Tempt Fate

If you have foreign business interests and think you might need to file Form 5471 or 5472, the best advice is simple: file them. 

Even if the forms are a headache and the rules seem complex, the potential costs of non-compliance—financial and otherwise—are simply too high to ignore. 

And as the Farhy case shows, while there may be occasional victories against the IRS, they are the exception rather than the rule. 

So, stay vigilant, keep those forms in mind, and avoid becoming another cautionary tale in the annals of tax non-compliance. 

The “Terrible Twosome” might be formidable, but with careful attention and professional guidance, they don’t have to be your undoing.