Singapore Budget 2026 – Key Tax Measures For Foreign-Owned SMEs
Boon Tan | 25 Feb 2026 | 3 min read
The 2026 Singapore Budget Statement was delivered by Lawrence Wong, Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, on 12 February 2026.
Five clear themes underpin the Budget:
Building an AI-first economy and investing in frontier technologies
Driving productivity and transformation, with near-term support for businesses (especially SMEs)
Strengthening internationalisation and Singapore’s position as a global hub
Providing cost-of-living and life-stage support
Enhancing resilience through security and sustainability initiatives
Aligned with these themes, several tax measures are particularly relevant to foreign-owned SMEs operating in Singapore.
1. 40% Corporate Income Tax Rebate – Year Of Assessment 2026
The Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Rebate for YA 2026 mirrors the concession announced last year.
Singapore companies will receive a 40% rebate on final tax payable for YA 2026.
Where a company has little or no tax liability, eligible companies may receive a CIT Rebate Cash Grant of up to S$1,500.
Eligibility For The Cash Grant
To qualify, a company must:
Be active; and
Have employed at least one local employee during calendar year 2025
A “local employee” refers to a Singapore Citizen or Permanent Resident for whom CPF contributions were made.
Where a company qualifies for both the rebate and the cash grant, the combined benefit equals 40% of tax payable, capped at S$30,000 per company.
Example
ABC Pte Ltd
Employed two Employment Pass holders in 2025
YA 2026 tax payable: S$50,000
CIT Rebate: S$50,000 × 40% = S$20,000
ABC does not qualify for the cash grant (no local employees).
XYZ Pte Ltd
Employed two local employees in 2025
YA 2026 tax payable: S$50,000
Total Benefit: S$20,000, structured as:
CIT Rebate: S$18,500
CIT Rebate Cash Grant: S$1,500
The total remains capped at 40% of tax payable.
2. Double Tax Deduction For Internationalisation (DTDi)
Under the Double Tax Deduction for Internationalisation scheme, companies may claim a 200% tax deduction on qualifying expenditure incurred for overseas market expansion and investment development.
Budget 2026 increases the automatic expenditure cap from:
S$150,000 → S$400,000 per year
This significantly enhances support for companies expanding regionally or globally.
In addition, the scope of expenses that can be claimed without prior approval has been expanded to cover all eligible overseas market development trips and overseas investment study trips.
Expenditure beyond S$400,000 will still require prior approval from Enterprise Singapore or the Singapore Tourism Board.
For foreign-owned SMEs using Singapore as a regional base, this is a meaningful enhancement.
3. Enhancements to the Enterprise Innovation Scheme (EIS)
The Enterprise Innovation Scheme allows companies to claim 400% tax deductions or allowances on qualifying expenditure including:
Qualifying R&D conducted in Singapore
Registration of intellectual property
Acquisition and licensing of IP rights
Budget 2026 adds a new category:
Up to S$50,000 of qualifying AI-related expenditure for YA 2027 and YA 2028.
Key Points:
The overall EIS expenditure cap remains S$400,000 per year
Companies may convert up to S$100,000 of qualifying expenditure into a 20% cash payout
However, this cash conversion option will not apply to AI-related expenditure
This signals a clear policy direction: encouraging AI capability building but maintaining fiscal discipline around cash support.
4. Extension Of 250% Tax Deduction For IPC Donations
The enhanced 250% tax deduction for donations made to Institutions of a Public Character (IPCs) was due to expire at the end of YA 2027.
Budget 2026 extends this incentive to 31 December 2029 (YA 2030).
This provides certainty for philanthropic planning and supports the broader social compact, particularly amid cost-of-living pressures.
What This Means For Foreign-Owned SMEs
From a tax perspective, Budget 2026 reinforces three strategic priorities:
Immediate relief to offset operating costs
Stronger incentives for regional expansion
Clear alignment toward AI and innovation capability building
For foreign-owned SMEs using Singapore as a regional headquarters, the message is consistent:
Singapore continues to support companies that hire locally, expand internationally, and invest in innovation.
Written by Boon Tan
Australian born with Singaporean heritage, Boon provides specialist tax advice to our clients in relation to establishment of corporate structures in Singapore and in-bound/out-bound taxation matters for individuals including expatriate employee and founders of companies entering Singapore.
While details contained in this article are accurate at the time of publication, they may be subject to changes in statutory and case law as well as Government policy, rulings and interpretation updates. Any opinions expressed are those of the writer and may no be representative of the CST firm or applicable under different circumstances. Any advice contained herein is generic in nature only and cannot be relied on for your personal situation. As such we cannot be held responsible for any damages that arise from applying generic information to your own situation. You should always seek professional advice tailored to your unique situation, taking into account the most recent legal changes and understandings at the relevant time.
Singapore Statutory Financial Statements: What Every Company Needs To Know
3rd Dec 2025
Boon Tan
If you run a company in Singapore, one annual non‑negotiable is getting your statutory financial statements done properly This article sets out the essentials so you can plan your year, avoid...
Expanding Into Singapore? Here’s How To Avoid Being Taxed Twice
6th Nov 2025
Boon Tan
When you scale into a new market, nothing drains momentum faster than paying tax on the same profit in two places The good news: Singapore’s pro-business tax framework and extensive network of...
Expanding To Singapore? Here’s How Government Grants Can Supercharge Your Entry
8th Oct 2025
Boon Tan
Singapore is more than just a gateway to Asia — it’s a launchpad for international growth With its pro-business policies, robust financial system, and strategic location, the city-state...
Hidden Tax Traps: Foreign Assets, FBAR, FATCA (Form 8938) And The Reporting “Cascade” After An International Divorce
Jurate Gulbinas | 24 Feb 2026 | 10 min read
International divorce frequently triggers a foreign-asset reporting cascade: accounts that were previously “handled by the other spouse,” jointly titled assets that get split, and new single-filer thresholds can turn a historically quiet situation into an immediate U.S. compliance problem, often with large civil penalties and, in willful cases, criminal exposure. The enforcement environment is also more aggressive, with enhanced IRS enforcement funding and more sophisticated analytics, increasing the likelihood that previously missed foreign reporting gets detected.
Foreign Asset Reporting: The “Big Three” Regimes (Quick Comparison)
Regime
What It Reports
Where Filed
Core Trigger
Due Date (for 2025 calendar year)
Key Penalty Framework
FBAR (FinCEN Form 114)
Foreign financial accounts (including bank, securities, some insurance/annuity accounts)
Separately from the tax return (FinCEN e-filing)
Aggregate foreign account value > $10,000 at any time during the year (all foreign accounts combined)
April 15, 2026 with automatic extension to October 15, 2026
For 2025 (inflation-adjusted): non-willful up to $16,536 per report; willful greater of $165,353 or 50% of the account balance per violation; criminal possible
FATCA (Form 8938)
Specified foreign financial assets (broader than FBAR: accounts plus many non-account assets like foreign stock/partnership interests, foreign pensions, etc.)
Attached to annual income tax return
Filing-status/residency thresholds (often $50,000/$75,000 for U.S. residents who are single/MFS)
Due with Form 1040 (generally April 15; expats often June deadline)
$10,000 failure-to-file plus $10,000 per 30 days after IRS notice up to $50,000
Triggered by foreign trust transactions/ownership (common in international family wealth and divorce settlements)[1]
Form 3520-A due 15th day of 3rd month after trust year-end (calendar-year trust: March 15; 6‑month extension available via Form 7004)
Form 3520: often greater of $10,000 or 35% of reportable amount (depending on part); Form 3520‑A: generally greater of $10,000 or 5% of gross reportable amount
Critical Overlap Point: Filing Form 8938 does not replace FBAR. If you meet both sets of rules, you generally file both.
1) FBAR (FinCEN Form 114): What Divorce Changes (And Why It Gets Missed)
The Filing Trigger (The “$10,000 Aggregate” Test)
FBAR is required when the aggregate value of all foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the year, a low threshold that is easy to cross when accounts exist in multiple countries or when a spouse holds several accounts.
Divorce-Specific Trap: People often assume FBAR only applies if they own the account. In divorce situations, the risk is that a taxpayer had signature authority or another filing obligation over accounts tied to the other spouse (for example, family business accounts or accounts in the spouse’s name).
Deadline And Extension (For 2025 Accounts)
For the 2025 calendar year, the FBAR is due on April 15, 2026, with an automatic extension to October 15, 2026 (no separate extension form required).
FBAR filers should retain supporting documentation with their tax records for at least five years.
In a divorce context, that retention period matters because spouses may lose access to account statements during or after separation; proactively preserving statements and proof of balances is often essential.
Penalties (Inflation-Adjusted Amounts For 2025)
Non-Willful FBAR Penalty (Civil) – up to $16,536 per report
Willful FBAR Penalty (Civil) – the greater of $165,353 or 50% of the account balance per violation
Criminal exposure is possible (especially in willful scenarios).
These numbers underscore why “we didn’t know” is not a strategy, particularly when divorce discovery, bank files, and cross-border information flows can surface old accounts.
Statute Of Limitations (Why Old Years Can Still Be In Play)
Standard audit limitation periods may not protect taxpayers when foreign reporting is missing. FBAR has a six-year period, and for certain failures (and fraud) older years may remain examinable.
2) FATCA Form 8938: “Specified Foreign Financial Assets” And Why Filing Status Changes Matter
What Form 8938 Covers (Broader Than Bank Accounts)
Form 8938 is required for certain U.S. taxpayers who hold specified foreign financial assets exceeding applicable thresholds. The IRS describes the basic rule as reporting when aggregate value exceeds $50,000 (with thresholds varying by taxpayer circumstances).
Form 8938 reaches beyond bank accounts and can include:
foreign securities,
foreign partnership/corporate interests,
trusts, and
foreign pensions.
This breadth is exactly why divorce restructurings (splitting entities, transferring shares, receiving pension rights) can suddenly trigger reporting even if “no foreign bank account” exists.
The Thresholds (Treas. Reg. §1.6038D-2): U.S. Residents vs. Living Abroad
The filing requirement turns on aggregate value exceeding a threshold that depends on residency and filing status.
Below are the thresholds expressly stated in the Form 8938 regulations:
Taxpayers Living In The U.S.
Unmarried / Married Filing Separately – file if aggregate value exceeds $50,000 on the last day of the year or $75,000 at any time during the year.
Married Filing Jointly – file if aggregate value exceeds $100,000 on the last day of the year or $150,000 at any time during the year.
Taxpayers Living Abroad (Qualified Individuals Under §911(d)(1))
Unmarried (Or Not Filing Jointly) – file if aggregate value exceeds $200,000 on the last day of the year or $300,000 at any time during the year.
Married Filing Jointly (Living Abroad) – file if aggregate value exceeds $400,000 on the last day of the year or $600,000 at any time during the year.
Divorce-Specific Trap: filing status changes (e.g., moving from married filing jointly to single or married filing separately) can materially lower the applicable threshold and create a new Form 8938 requirement even when the assets did not change. The regulation thresholds above show why: the U.S.-resident MFJ threshold is $100,000/$150,000, but single/MFS is $50,000/$75,000.
Deadline (Tied To The Income Tax Return)
Form 8938 is filed with the annual income tax return (as an attachment), not separately like FBAR. This creates a common divorce-year failure mode: the return gets filed on time, but the foreign asset schedule is omitted, even when FBAR was filed (or vice versa).
Penalties (And Why They Can Snowball)
Initial Failure-To-File Penalty – $10,000
Continuation Penalty After IRS Notice – $10,000 for every 30 days of continued noncompliance after notice, up to $50,000 maximum (per year)
Statute Of Limitations Risk
Missing Form 8938 can keep the statute of limitations open, which means taxpayers may find that very old years are still exposed once the IRS identifies an unreported foreign asset footprint.
3) Foreign Trust Reporting (Forms 3520 And 3520-A): The Divorce Settlement Danger Zone
International divorces frequently involve structures that are “trust-like” (even when they aren’t labeled as such), offshore family arrangements, or wealth vehicles that make distributions or transfers as part of a settlement.
Form 3520 – when penalties can be a percentage of the transfer/distribution.
The Internal Revenue Manual section provided includes detailed penalty computations that are especially important in divorce cases because transfers/distributions are exactly what settlements do.
For late-filed Form 3520, the IRS penalty computation depends on what is being reported:
If Form 3520 Part I (generally, certain foreign trust transactions such as transfers) is triggered, assess a penalty equal to the greater of $10,000 or 35% of the total amount reported (with specific line references in the IRM guidance).
• The IRM also provides that the aggregate penalty for Part I cannot exceed the gross reportable amount.
If Form 3520 Part III (generally, certain foreign trust distributions) is triggered, assess a penalty equal to the greater of $10,000 or 35% of the amount reported (again with detailed line references).
• The IRM similarly limits the aggregate penalty so it cannot exceed the gross reportable amount.
Form 3520-A: Annual Return For Foreign Trusts With A U.S. Owner
A foreign trust must file Form 3520-A annually when a U.S. person is treated as an owner of any portion of the foreign trust under the grantor trust rules (sections 671–679), and Form 3520-A includes required owner and beneficiary statements.
To avoid penalties for failure to timely file Form 3520-A, the U.S. owner must ensure the foreign trust timely files it, or the U.S. owner must file a substitute Form 3520-A with a timely-filed Form 3520.
Due Date
Form 3520-A is due the 15th day of the 3rd month following the end of the trust’s tax year (e.g., for a calendar-year trust, March 15), with a 6-month extended due date if the trust files an extension (Form 7004).
Penalty Framework (Form 3520-A)
The IRM states: the initial penalty for failure to file Form 3520-A generally is the greater of $10,000 or 5% of the gross reportable amount, where the gross reportable amount is the gross value of the portion of the trust’s assets treated as owned by each U.S. owner at year-end.
4) A Key Practical Point: “FBAR vs. Form 8938” Is Not Either/Or
A recurring compliance failure in international divorce matters is assuming that one form “covers” the other. It does not.
Form 8938 is filed with the IRS as part of the income tax return and covers “specified foreign financial assets.”
FBAR is a separate filing with its own threshold and due date mechanics (including automatic extension).
Filing Form 8938 does not relieve the taxpayer from filing FBAR when the FBAR rules are triggered.
Divorce Implication: You can be “compliant” on the tax return and still have FBAR exposure, or you can have FBAR filed and still have Form 8938 exposure, especially after filing status changes lower the 8938 threshold.
5) Common International Divorce Reporting Triggers That Deserve Special Attention
A. “I Never Benefited From The Account” (But Had An Obligation)
Divorce can reveal unrecognized historical obligations tied to a spouse’s accounts or business (including signatory authority). This matters because the FBAR regime is driven by account access/relationship and aggregate balances, not just whether you considered it “your money.”
B. Filing Status Shift Can Turn “No Form 8938” Into “Form 8938 Required”
The reporting thresholds change significantly when filing status changes (MFJ to single/MFS), creating new reporting requirements. The regulation thresholds show exactly how large the shift can be for U.S. residents: $100,000/$150,000 (MFJ) versus $50,000/$75,000 (single/MFS).
C. Trust Structures Embedded In Settlements (Or Foreign “Pensions” That Behave Like Trusts)
If a settlement causes a transfer to a foreign trust or a distribution from one, the IRM penalty computations show why the exposure can be economically severe (35% regimes for certain Form 3520 failures; 5% asset-value penalty for certain Form 3520-A failures).
D. Deadlines And “Hidden” Annual Compliance Calendars
FBAR – April 15 with automatic extension to October 15 (for 2025, due April 15, 2026 / Oct 15, 2026).
Form 8938 – with the tax return.
Form 3520-A – March 15 for calendar-year trusts (15th day of the 3rd month), extension possible via Form 7004.
International divorce clients often focus on the divorce timeline (court deadlines, settlement deadlines) and miss that these compliance calendars run independently.
E. Old-Year Exposure Can Persist When Foreign Reporting Is Missing
For most tax issues, the IRS has three years to audit (six years if the income understatement exceeds 25%). But foreign reporting failures have different rules:
No Form 8938 File – Statute never begins to run on the entire return
No FBAR Filed – Six-year statute of limitations under Bank Secrecy Act
Fraudulent Return – No statute of limitations ever
Real-World Impact: The IRS can audit a 2015 return in 2026 if foreign asset reporting was required but not filed.
Conclusion: International Divorce Turns “Foreign Assets” Into An Active Compliance Event
The foreign reporting rules are deliberately complex. The IRS uses this complexity as a weapon, assuming that confusion equals willful violation. In international divorce cases, the complexity multiplies because you’re dealing with:
Changing filing statuses mid-year
Assets you may not have known existed
Reporting obligations that weren’t yours during marriage but became yours after divorce
Settlement agreements that don’t account for international tax issues
When divorce changes ownership, access, filing status, and documentation availability all at once, the safest posture is to treat foreign-asset reporting as its own workstream—with clear form-by-form mapping, threshold testing, deadline management, and record retention aligned to the regimes above.
Written by Jurate Gulbinas
As a dual-qualified California CPA and tax attorney, Jurate provides comprehensive, strategic tax solutions for individuals, families, and businesses facing complex domestic and international tax challenges.
While details contained in this article are accurate at the time of publication, they may be subject to changes in statutory and case law as well as Government policy, rulings and interpretation updates. Any opinions expressed are those of the writer and may no be representative of the CST firm or applicable under different circumstances. Any advice contained herein is generic in nature only and cannot be relied on for your personal situation. As such we cannot be held responsible for any damages that arise from applying generic information to your own situation. You should always seek professional advice tailored to your unique situation, taking into account the most recent legal changes and understandings at the relevant time.
Baturin v. Commissioner: Understanding The Line Between Research Grants And Compensation
9th Mar 2026
Jurate Gulbinas
A Practical Analysis Of Treaty Interpretation And The Quid Pro Quo Test Spoiler Alert: If you have a boss, get performance reviews, and can be fired for poor work, you probably have a job and not...
Does Your Wise Account Need To Be Reported On FBAR Or FATCA?
6th Mar 2026
Marcus Shimotsu
If you live internationally, run an online business, invest across borders, or use platforms like Wise to manage multiple currencies, you may be wondering: Do I need to report my Wise account to...
How To Prepare For Your First Tax Season After Moving Abroad
6th Feb 2026
Marcus Shimotsu
A Practical Checklist For Australians Moving To The United States Moving from Australia to the United States is exciting, but the first US tax season can feel like stepping into a maze The US tax...
Immigration And Visas: The Practical Playbook For Australian Businesses Entering The US
John Marcarian | 20 Feb 2026 | 8 min read
Expanding into the US can be a growth-defining move for an Australian business — new customers, deeper capital markets, a bigger talent pool. But there’s one reality that catches founders off guard: in the US, immigration isn’t a “formality.” It’s a regulated operating system. If you treat it like admin, it will eventually treat you like a compliance event.
At a high level, three agencies shape most employment- and investment-based pathways:
USCIS (US Citizenship and Immigration Services) – adjudicates petitions and many work-authorisation processes inside the US
DOL (Department of Labor) – protects US wage and working-condition standards (especially for employer-sponsored roles)
DOS (Department of State) – issues visas at US embassies/consulates outside the US
When these agencies don’t align — or when documentation isn’t airtight — the cost is rarely “just delay.” It can disrupt onboarding, derail projects, and create legal exposure you don’t want attached to your US launch.
The E-3 Visa: Australia’s Unfair Advantage (When You Can Use It)
For many Australian companies and professionals, the E-3 is the cleanest entry point. It’s available only to Australian citizens working in a specialty occupation (typically requiring at least a bachelor’s degree or equivalent).
Why it’s so attractive:
A dedicated annual cap (10,500) that has historically not been reached
Lower friction and cost compared to many alternatives
Renewable in two-year increments with the ability to extend repeatedly (so long as eligibility remains)
A major practical benefit: spouses of E-3 holders can obtain work authorisation (EAD) and work broadly in the US. For many families, that single feature makes the E-3 dramatically more livable than other work visas.
The key constraint: E-3 is not “dual intent.” In plain English: it’s designed as a temporary visa. You generally need to maintain the narrative (and supporting facts) that you intend to return to Australia. That doesn’t make a future green card impossible, but it does mean you need a plan — and you need to time it properly.
When E-3 Doesn’t Fit: The Other Work Visa Lanes
If the role or candidate doesn’t qualify for E-3 — or if permanent residency is part of the strategy — the next options depend on your structure and the person’s profile.
H-1B: The Well-Known Option (And The Lottery Problem)
H-1B also targets specialty occupations, but it’s open to all nationalities — which is why it’s heavily oversubscribed. Most applicants face a lottery due to annual caps (commonly referenced as 65,000 plus an additional 20,000 for certain US master’s degree holders).
Why companies still use it:
Dual Intent (clearer alignment with future green card planning)
The downside many families feel most:
Spousal work rights can be more limited and situational than E-3 (some H-4 spouses can qualify for an EAD under specific conditions, but it’s not as straightforward as E-3/E-2 in practice).
L-1: Ideal For Intracompany Transfers (If You Have The Structure)
L-1 is often the most logical pathway when you have a real operating company in Australia and you’re transferring someone to a US entity.
L-1A for executives/managers
L-1B for specialised knowledge staff
Requires the employee to have worked for the overseas entity for at least one year within the preceding three years (in most cases)
Dual intent is permitted
This visa often works best when your corporate structure and role definitions are clean — and when your organisational chart supports what you’re claiming.
O-1: For Top-Tier Profiles With Evidence To Match
The O-1 is for individuals with extraordinary ability (business, science, arts, etc.). There’s no annual cap, and extensions can continue as long as the work remains eligible.
But this is not a “strong resume” visa — it’s an evidence visa. Think:
major awards or significant recognition
published material about the person
critical roles in distinguished organisations
judging, original contributions, high salary, and other recognised criteria
If the story is “they’re excellent,” O-1 is hard. If the story is “their excellence is documented by third parties,” O-1 becomes very viable.
The E-2 Visa: The Founder/Operator Pathway
For entrepreneurs and owner-operators, E-2 can be a powerful route. Australia is a treaty country for E-2, and the visa is designed for people who will develop and direct a US business they’ve invested in.
Key points that matter in real life:
You generally need to own at least 50% (or otherwise control the enterprise)
The investment must be substantial and genuinely at risk (committed and exposed to loss)
There’s no fixed minimum, but in practice investments often sit in a broad range (commonly US$100k–$500k+, depending on the business model)
The business can’t be “marginal” — it should be capable of supporting more than just the investor’s household over time
Like the E-3, a major family advantage is that E-2 spouses can obtain open work authorisation.
Compliance That Actually Matters: LCAs, Files, And Timelines
For E-3 and H-1B, one recurring compliance anchor is the Labor Condition Application (LCA). This is where the employer certifies (to the DOL) that the worker will be paid appropriately (prevailing wage rules) and that hiring them won’t undercut local working conditions.
A few operational truths:
Processing timelines vary – E-3 can often be relatively quick; H-1B and some USCIS petitions can take longer due to caps, scrutiny, and workflow
Your file is your defence– job descriptions, wage rationale, organisational charts, degree equivalency support, and consistent HR records matter more than people expect
Tracking expiry dates isn’t optional – late renewals create avoidable risk and business interruption
The Tax Trap: Immigration Status ≠ Tax Status
This is the part that blindsides many Australians.
Your visa category does not determine US tax residency. The IRS applies the Substantial Presence Test, which is based on days in the US over a rolling period. It’s entirely possible to be on a temporary visa and still become a US tax resident, meaning worldwide income may enter the US tax net.
That can pull in items Australians don’t expect to be “in play,” including:
investment income from Australia
complex treatment questions around superannuation
reporting regimes that can apply to foreign accounts and entities
state tax exposure (often the nastiest surprise), especially in places like California and New York, which operate with their own rules and don’t “care” as much about treaty outcomes as people assume
The US–Australia tax treaty can help mitigate double taxation, but treaties don’t automatically make complexity disappear — they often just change how you need to document and position the outcome.
The Mistakes That Create Expensive Problems
A few patterns show up again and again in US market entries:
Misclassifying Employees As Contractors To “Simplify Payroll” This can trigger issues with the DOL and IRS, and it’s a fast way to attract scrutiny.
Building The US Plan First And Asking Immigration To “Make It Work” Later Better approach: design the role, entity structure, and timeline with the visa pathway in mind.
Overstays And Timing Errors Overstaying by more than 180 days can trigger a three-year re-entry bar, and one year can trigger a ten-year bar. Those are business-ending outcomes for the wrong person at the wrong time.
A Practical Way To Think About It
If you’re entering the US, treat immigration and tax as two parallel workstreams:
Immigration Workstream – right visa, right evidence, right timing
When those two streams are coordinated early, the US expansion feels controllable. When they’re not, businesses find themselves reacting — and reaction is always more expensive than design.
General information only — not legal or tax advice. US immigration and tax outcomes depend heavily on facts, timing, and documentation.
CHECKLIST: Australia – US Market Entry Checklist
To assist you and your team we have created the “Australia-US Market Entry Checklist“. The checklist guides your team through:
Identifying the most appropriate and strategic pathways for US expansion by Australian businesses.
Reducing expansion risk through clear tax, legal, and regulatory guidance.
Enabling a smooth transition into the US market and maximising long-term success.
Written by John Marcarian
John is an Australian Chartered Accountant with over 25 years of experience.
Having founded CST Tax Advisors in 1992, John has in-depth knowledge of international tax matters for both businesses and globally mobile expats.
While details contained in this article are accurate at the time of publication, they may be subject to changes in statutory and case law as well as Government policy, rulings and interpretation updates. Any opinions expressed are those of the writer and may no be representative of the CST firm or applicable under different circumstances. Any advice contained herein is generic in nature only and cannot be relied on for your personal situation. As such we cannot be held responsible for any damages that arise from applying generic information to your own situation. You should always seek professional advice tailored to your unique situation, taking into account the most recent legal changes and understandings at the relevant time.
Expanding Stateside: A Guide to Navigating US Employment Law for Australian Businesses
17th Mar 2026
John Marcarian
Taking your Australian business to the United States is an exciting milestone, but it comes with a steep learning curve—especially regarding human resources and employment law In...
Australian Businesses Expanding to the USA – Structuring Your Business for US Expansion
27th Jan 2026
John Marcarian
Most Australian businesses don’t fail in the United States because the market rejects them They fail because the structure underneath them wasn’t built for the way the US actually...
PFIC And Attribution Issues For Australian Expats In The USA
23rd Oct 2025
John Marcarian
Why This Matters Many Australians arrive in the US with sensible portfolios at home such as ASX listed exchange traded funds, listed investment companies, unit trusts or managed funds, and...
How To Prepare For Your First Tax Season After Moving Abroad
Marcus Shimotsu | 6 Feb 2026 | 4 min read
A Practical Checklist For Australians Moving To The United States
Moving from Australia to the United States is exciting, but the first U.S. tax season can feel like stepping into a maze. The U.S. tax system is far more document-driven and globally focused than Australia’s, and many new arrivals are caught off guard by what the IRS expects.
The good news? With the right preparation before you move, your first tax season can be far less stressful. Here’s a checklist of items every Australian should gather and understand before relocating to the U.S.
1. Clear Records Of Your Move Date (This Matters More Than You Think)
Your exact date of arrival in the U.S. is critical. U.S. tax residency is not based on intention—it’s based on days physically present. You also need to have records of any dates you’ve left (even for temporary travel) the U.S. once you’ve moved.
Have on hand:
Flight itineraries and entry stamps
Visa start date
Lease agreements or housing contracts
Any travel dates after your move to the U.S.
These dates determine whether you’re treated as:
A nonresident,
A dual-status taxpayer, or
A U.S. tax resident for that year
This classification drives everything that follows.
2. Copies Of Your Most Recent Australian Tax Returns
Bring at least the last two years of:
Australian individual tax returns
Notices of assessment
PAYG summaries or income statements
These help:
Establish income earned before U.S. residency
Support treaty positions
Substantiate foreign tax credits later
Even income that won’t be taxed again in the U.S. often needs to be reported.
3. A Full Snapshot Of Your Worldwide Income (Not Just Salary)
The U.S. taxes based on citizenship and residency, not source. Once you’re a U.S. tax resident, the IRS wants to see everything.
Prepare documentation for:
Australian employment income
Bonuses paid after you leave (even if earned before)
Rental income
Dividends and interest
Trust or partnership distributions
If it earned money anywhere in the world, assume the U.S. cares.
4. Details Of All Australian Bank Accounts
Many Australians are surprised to learn that foreign bank accounts are a major U.S. compliance issue, not a minor one.
You’ll want:
Bank names and addresses
Account numbers
Maximum balances during the year
Why this matters:
Accounts may trigger FBAR and FATCA reporting
Penalties for missing these forms can be severe even when no tax is owed
This includes everyday savings and transaction accounts.
5. Information On Your Superannuation Accounts
Australian superannuation is one of the most misunderstood areas in U.S.–Australia tax planning.
Before moving, gather:
Super fund statements
Employer vs personal contribution history
Withdrawal restrictions
The U.S. does not treat super the same way Australia does. In some cases:
Earnings may be taxable annually
Reporting obligations may apply even if funds are locked until retirement
This is an area where advance planning pays off.
6. Investment And Asset Purchase Records
If you own assets, documentation is essential to avoid double taxation later.
Bring records for:
Australian shares or ETFs
Property purchase contracts
Cost base and acquisition dates
Crypto transaction history
The U.S. uses different rules for:
Capital gains
Depreciation
Currency conversion
Without records, you may pay more tax than necessary.
7. Visa And Immigration Documents
Your visa type can affect how the IRS views you.
Have copies of:
Visa approval notices
I-94 arrival records
Employment authorization documents
Certain visas may qualify for:
Treaty benefits
Temporary exemptions from residency tests
But these benefits are time-limited and documentation-dependent.
8. Awareness Of The U.S.–Australia Tax Treaty
The tax treaty can:
Prevent double taxation
Modify how certain income is taxed
Provide tie-breaker rules for residency
But treaties are not automatic. You must claim them correctly on your return.
Knowing this ahead of time helps avoid missed opportunities.
9. A Cross-Border Tax Advisor (Before You Need One)
Perhaps the most important item on this list isn’t a document—it’s expert guidance.
The U.S. tax system:
Penalizes late or incorrect filings harshly (penalties for a single missing form can amount to tens of thousands of dollars)
Requires proactive reporting
Treats foreign assets with heightened scrutiny
Working with someone who understands both Australian and U.S. tax systems can save you time, money, and stress in your first year.
Final Thought
Your first U.S. tax season doesn’t start in April—it starts before you board the plane. A little preparation now can prevent expensive mistakes later and help you start your new chapter in the U.S. with confidence.
Written by Marcus Shimotsu
Marcus Shimotsu is an experienced tax CPA with a wide array of tax expertise including international tax. He has assisted non-US individuals and companies navigate the complex US tax environment and US companies manage tax for their foreign subsidiaries. Through his extensive knowledge, Marcus provides services including tax returns, tax planning, and written tax advice.
While details contained in this article are accurate at the time of publication, they may be subject to changes in statutory and case law as well as Government policy, rulings and interpretation updates. Any opinions expressed are those of the writer and may no be representative of the CST firm or applicable under different circumstances. Any advice contained herein is generic in nature only and cannot be relied on for your personal situation. As such we cannot be held responsible for any damages that arise from applying generic information to your own situation. You should always seek professional advice tailored to your unique situation, taking into account the most recent legal changes and understandings at the relevant time.
Baturin v. Commissioner: Understanding The Line Between Research Grants And Compensation
9th Mar 2026
Jurate Gulbinas
A Practical Analysis Of Treaty Interpretation And The Quid Pro Quo Test Spoiler Alert: If you have a boss, get performance reviews, and can be fired for poor work, you probably have a job and not...
Does Your Wise Account Need To Be Reported On FBAR Or FATCA?
6th Mar 2026
Marcus Shimotsu
If you live internationally, run an online business, invest across borders, or use platforms like Wise to manage multiple currencies, you may be wondering: Do I need to report my Wise account to...
Hidden Tax Traps: Foreign Assets, FBAR, FATCA (Form 8938) And The Reporting “Cascade” After An International Divorce
24th Feb 2026
Jurate Gulbinas
International divorce frequently triggers a foreign-asset reporting cascade: accounts that were previously “handled by the other spouse,” jointly titled assets that get split, and new...