FBAR Violations And Recklessness: What You Need To Know To Avoid Hefty Penalties

John Marcarian   |   9 Sep 2024   |   6 min read

The U.S. government’s crackdown on offshore tax evasion has placed the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) in the spotlight. Many U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts may not fully understand their obligation to disclose these accounts, and even fewer realize the severe penalties that come with failing to comply. For U.S. citizens, residents, and entities with foreign financial accounts, the stakes are high.

Understanding FBAR requirements and the line between non-willful and willful violations, including recklessness, can mean the difference between a reasonable penalty or a financial disaster. A key case illustrating this legal battlefield is Bedrosian v. United States, a cautionary tale for those who might be unaware—or choose to remain unaware—of their filing obligations.

FBAR Reporting Requirements And Penalties: An Overview

U.S. citizens, residents, and certain entities are required to file an FBAR if the aggregate value of their foreign accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point during the calendar year. This requirement applies even if the accounts don’t generate taxable income. The FBAR is filed annually with FinCEN, separate from tax returns.

Penalties for failing to comply are steep:

  • Non-Willful Violations: Penalties for non-willful violations are generally capped at $10,000 per violation unless the taxpayer can show reasonable cause.
  • Willful Violations: For willful violations, penalties can be far more significant, often up to 50% of the account balance or $100,000, whichever is greater. In some cases, criminal charges can also be brought.

The difference between willful and non-willful violations is central to determining penalties, and recent court cases and IRS guidance have clarified that recklessness can meet the standard for willful conduct.

Bedrosian Case: Recklessness Redefined

In Bedrosian v. United States, the issue of recklessness in the context of FBAR penalties took center stage. Arthur Bedrosian, a successful businessman from Pennsylvania, had held foreign accounts with UBS in Switzerland. Despite being aware of his FBAR obligations, he failed to report one of his accounts in 2007. The IRS imposed a $975,789 penalty, citing willful failure to file.

Initially, the district court sided with Bedrosian, ruling that his actions were non-willful, and reduced the penalty to $10,000. However, on appeal, the 3rd Circuit Court found that the district court had applied an incorrect standard of willfulness, specifically underestimating the role of recklessness in FBAR violations. The 3rd Circuit clarified that recklessness can indeed qualify as willfulness, and remanded the case for further review. Upon reconsideration, the district court determined that Bedrosian’s failure to report the account demonstrated at least reckless disregard, and the original penalty was reinstated.

Key Case On Recklessness: McBride And FBAR Penalties

A landmark case discussing recklessness in FBAR violations is United States v. McBride. In this case, the taxpayer, Michael McBride, failed to file an FBAR for his offshore accounts. The court found that McBride acted with reckless disregard of the filing requirements, even though he claimed ignorance. The court emphasized that recklessness could be inferred from a taxpayer’s knowledge of the law and his failure to comply with it, even if there wasn’t a clear intent to break the law.

The McBride decision underscored that a taxpayer doesn’t need to knowingly violate FBAR obligations to be penalized severely. Acting recklessly—such as choosing not to learn the rules or ignoring clear indications that filing is required—can be sufficient to trigger the harshest penalties.

IRS’s Approach To Determining Willfulness: The Role Of Evidence

The IRS takes a broad approach when assessing whether an FBAR violation was willful or reckless. In doing so, the agency looks at various forms of evidence to determine whether a taxpayer’s failure to file was due to deliberate intent, recklessness, or negligence. Key factors include:

  • Prior Filings And Disclosures: The IRS may review past tax returns and FBAR filings to assess whether the taxpayer has consistently disclosed foreign accounts. A pattern of non-disclosure could suggest willfulness.
  • Foreign Bank Communications: Correspondence between the taxpayer and their foreign bank can provide clues about willfulness. For instance, if the bank warned the taxpayer about FBAR requirements, and they still failed to comply, this could indicate recklessness.
  • Education and Background Of The Taxpayer: The IRS will also take into account the taxpayer’s background and sophistication. For instance, someone with a high level of financial literacy, such as a business owner or an individual working in finance, is more likely to be held to a higher standard of knowledge regarding their obligations. In Bedrosian, for example, his years of financial dealings and awareness of offshore accounts contributed to the court’s determination of recklessness.
  • Taxpayer Behavior: Deliberate concealment, such as moving funds to different jurisdictions or closing accounts after learning of an investigation, can be viewed as willful.

The Internal Revenue Manual also provides guidelines for IRS examiners to follow when assessing willfulness. The IRS is particularly focused on patterns of behavior that demonstrate a conscious choice to disregard the law.

What Does This Mean For Taxpayers?

Taxpayers who hold foreign accounts must be aware of the serious consequences of failing to comply with FBAR requirements. The distinction between willful and non-willful violations is often determined by the taxpayer’s behavior and the totality of the circumstances, not just their direct knowledge of the law. The IRS will scrutinize the individual’s past filings, communications, and behavior to determine whether their failure to file was reckless or deliberate.

As seen in McBride and Bedrosian, recklessness doesn’t require overt intent to evade the law. Simply failing to act on information, or ignoring a known legal duty, can lead to penalties amounting to 50% of the account balance. The IRS’s focus on recklessness means that taxpayers cannot afford to be passive about their foreign accounts. They must actively ensure compliance or risk facing substantial financial penalties.

Conclusion

With the growing focus on offshore tax evasion, the U.S. government has ramped up its enforcement of FBAR penalties. The Bedrosian and McBride cases highlight the importance of understanding the broad definition of willfulness, which includes reckless conduct. Taxpayers who fail to disclose foreign accounts may face severe penalties, even if they claim ignorance. Staying informed and seeking expert advice is critical for anyone with international financial interests.

NEED ASSISTANCE FOR YOUR SITUATION?

Contact us today
Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Do you need tax services in our other regions?
By providing us your information you agree to our privacy policy

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

Corporate Residency

Please provide your details to access the online tool

Name is required.

Email is required.

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

Place of
Incorporation

Is the company incorporated outside Australia?

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

Central Management
and Control

Is the Central Management and Control
of the company exercised in Australia?

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

Carry on a Business

Does the company carry on a business in Australia?

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

Voting Power

Is the company's voting power controlled
by shareholders who are residents of Australia?

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

The company is an Australian Resident

Contact us for tailored international tax advice
regarding your client's specific situation.

Contact us for tailored international tax advice regarding your client's specific situation.

Contact Us

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

The company is not a resident
but it could be a CFC

Contact us for tailored international tax advice
regarding your client's specific situation.

Contact us for tailored international tax advice regarding your client's specific situation.

Contact Us

Determining Corporate Residency

Use our online tool to determine the corporate residency of your client's business.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

By providing us your information you agree to our privacy policy

More articles like this

 

The Terrible Twosome: Form 5471 And 5472


20th Aug 2024
John Marcarian

Declaring Foreign Business Interests Navigating the US tax code can feel like tiptoeing through a minefield, especially when you throw in international dealings  If you're a US person or...

 

U.S. Estate Tax Exposure For Non-Residents With U.S. Assets 


29th Jul 2024
John Marcarian

For many people the United States is a major investment jurisdiction Whether that investment is made into stocks, bonds, managed funds, real estate or shares in US private companies – the size...

 

Understanding Section 962 of the IRC: An Essential Tool for U.S. Tax Residents with Foreign Investments


30th May 2024
John Marcarian

The United States tax code presents a labyrinth of rules and regulations, particularly for US residents with investments in foreign corporations These complexities are magnified when dealing with...

 

The Terrible Twosome: Form 5471 And 5472


20th Aug 2024
John Marcarian

Declaring Foreign Business Interests Navigating the US tax code can feel like tiptoeing through a minefield, especially when you throw in...

 

U.S. Estate Tax Exposure For Non-Residents With U.S. Assets 


29th Jul 2024
John Marcarian

For many people the United States is a major investment jurisdiction Whether that investment is made into stocks, bonds, managed funds, real...

 

Understanding Section 962 of the IRC: An Essential Tool for U.S. Tax Residents with Foreign Investments


30th May 2024
John Marcarian

The United States tax code presents a labyrinth of rules and regulations, particularly for US residents with investments in foreign corporations...