{"id":6363,"date":"2026-06-24T10:22:24","date_gmt":"2026-06-24T02:22:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/?p=6363"},"modified":"2026-06-25T10:50:33","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T02:50:33","slug":"when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/","title":{"rendered":"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Lessons From The Latest Singapore Medical Professionals Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The High Court decision in <strong><em>Tan Chek Jin Adrian and others v Comptroller of Income Tax<\/em> [2026] SGHC 132<\/strong> is an important reminder that tax-efficient structuring must be supported by commercial substance, credible evidence and ongoing governance.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case involved three specialist obstetricians and gynaecologists \u2014 Dr. Tan, Dr. Khi and Dr. Wong &#8211; who had worked together at a hospital before moving into private practice as partners.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the heart of the case was the question of when legitimate business structuring crossed the line into tax avoidance.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Background<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctors had organised their private practice through several companies.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2004, the three doctors incorporated ACJ Women\u2019s Clinic Pte Ltd as joint shareholders, with each doctor employed by the company at a monthly salary of S$5,000, excluding bonus. This company invoiced patients for both inpatient and outpatient services.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Between 2005 and 2007, each doctor formed their own companies to invoice ACJ Women\u2019s Clinic, with each of them employed for monthly salaries of $6,000.\u00a0 It was submitted during the case that this was required to ensure equitable profit distribution.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2014, each added a second private company, which invoiced patients for inpatient services. ACJ Women\u2019s Clinic continued to invoice for outpatient services.\u00a0 It was stated that this was done to segregate the inpatient and outpatient income streams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each time a new company was incorporated, it allowed the doctors\u2019 companies to access the Start-Up Tax Exemption (SUTE) and Partial Tax Exemption (PTE) concessions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2016, the doctors took steps to strike off the personal companies formed between 2005 and 2007. The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) objected to the applications made for each company and commenced an audit of each company which expanded to the entire arrangement.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>IRAS\u2019s Position And Assessment<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">IRAS took issue with the way the structure operated and concluded that the doctors\u2019 salaries and directors\u2019 fees did not reflect the true economic value of their professional contributions. Prior to the incorporation of ACJ Women\u2019s Clinic, each doctor drew monthly salaries of $40,000 &#8211; $50,0000.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">IRAS also took issue with substantial profits being extracted through tax-exempt dividends and interest-free shareholder loans, while the doctors\u2019 taxable remuneration remained relatively low.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">IRAS invoked section 33 of the Income Tax Act, Singapore\u2019s general anti-avoidance provision, and issued additional and amended assessments for Years of Assessment 2013 to 2018 to each doctor.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctors challenged IRAS before the Income Tax Board of Review and then before the High Court of Singapore.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They argued that the various entities should not be treated as a single arrangement, and that each company had genuine commercial purposes, including limiting liability, allocating profits more fairly and separating inpatient from outpatient services.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, the doctors argued that any tax advantages arose from changes in the tax environment over time that they could not have foreseen when the structure was first created.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Ruling By Justice Wong<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justice Wong rejected these arguments and confirmed that the Comptroller and the Income Tax Board of Review were entitled to look at the arrangement holistically.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justice Wong ruled that Section 33 of ITA is broad enough to cover a combination of steps, even if each individual step may appear unobjectionable on its own. In this case, Justice Wong stated that each company associated with the doctors were connected through arrangements that evolved over time.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A particularly important part of the judgment is the court\u2019s treatment of purpose. The doctors\u2019 case focused heavily on their intentions when the structure was first put in place. Justice Wong made clear that this was too narrow. Tax arrangements often operate over many years, and motivations can evolve as businesses grow and tax laws change. The court was therefore entitled to examine not only why the structure was created, but also how it was implemented and used in practice.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The evidence was critical. Only Dr. Tan gave evidence. Dr. Khi and Dr. Wong did not, which hindered their case as the statutory exception under section 33 requires an inquiry into each taxpayer\u2019s subjective commercial motives and intended consequences. The two doctors relied on Dr. Tan providing the evidence on behalf of all the parties \u2013 which was a flawed position.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For Dr. Tan, the court accepted that there may have been bona fide commercial reasons for establishing ACJ Women\u2019s Clinic at the outset. However, Dr. Tan did not adequately explain why his S$5,000 monthly salary remained unchanged as the practice became more profitable, or why substantial profits were instead extracted as dividends and shareholder loans.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the Years of Assessment 2013 to 2018, the Comptroller valued Dr. Tan\u2019s tax-exempt dividends from ACJ Women\u2019s Clinic at S$1.6 million, with shareholder loans to the doctors collectively exceeding S$1 million.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court also gave little weight to Dr. Tan\u2019s references to discussions with his accountant. The accountant was not called as a witness, and no written advice was produced.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justice Wong noted that if professional advice had been central to the structuring, evidence of that advice should have been provided.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is one of the most practical lessons from the case: commercial rationale should be documented contemporaneously, not reconstructed years later during an audit or dispute.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctors also sought to rely on the SUTE and PTE provisions. Justice Wong held that these incentives were intended to encourage entrepreneurship, business growth and reinvestment. On the facts, the medical and surgical companies were not shown to have pursued business ideas or reinvested profits to grow their businesses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They were viewed as corporate vehicles used to receive income and shield liabilities. The court therefore held that the incentive provisions did not prevent IRAS from applying section 33.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Take Aways<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For business owners and founders, this case highlights that your legal form must align with commercial and economic realities. Remuneration policies should be market-aligned and defensible.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Intercompany arrangements should reflect actual functions, assets and risks. Dividend and loan policies should be explainable and again, mirror commercial practice. Most importantly, the commercial reasons for a structure should be properly documented and reviewed as the business grows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Singapore remains an attractive and business-friendly jurisdiction. But this decision shows that IRAS and the courts will scrutinise arrangements that produce significant tax advantages without sufficient commercial substance.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are looking to establish your business in Singapore, you must ensure that you take professional advice that is documented and reviewed regularly as your business grows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key Lessons From The Latest Singapore Medical Professionals Case The High Court decision in Tan Chek Jin Adrian and others v Comptroller of Income Tax [2026] SGHC 132 is an important reminder that tax-efficient structuring must be supported by commercial substance, credible evidence and ongoing governance.\u00a0 The case involved three specialist obstetricians and gynaecologists \u2014 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":6364,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-singapore-tax-system"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The recent Singapore medical professionals tax ruling highlights lessons on business structuring, tax planning, documentation, and managing compliance risks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The recent Singapore medical professionals tax ruling highlights lessons on business structuring, tax planning, documentation, and managing compliance risks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CST Tax Singapore\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-24T02:22:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-25T02:50:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425-1024x738.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"738\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boon Tan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boon Tan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boon Tan\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/f1b27565c3a54305840cd83ab939aefb\"},\"headline\":\"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-24T02:22:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-25T02:50:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/\"},\"wordCount\":1063,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Singapore Tax System\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/\",\"name\":\"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-24T02:22:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-25T02:50:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/f1b27565c3a54305840cd83ab939aefb\"},\"description\":\"The recent Singapore medical professionals tax ruling highlights lessons on business structuring, tax planning, documentation, and managing compliance risks.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png\",\"width\":1332,\"height\":960},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/\",\"name\":\"CST Tax Singapore\",\"description\":\"International Tax and Accounting Services\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/f1b27565c3a54305840cd83ab939aefb\",\"name\":\"Boon Tan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/05\/ENGN-076-colour-scaled-e1653290114550-96x96.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/05\/ENGN-076-colour-scaled-e1653290114550-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/05\/ENGN-076-colour-scaled-e1653290114550-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Boon Tan\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/about-us\/boon-tan\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/author\/boon\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance","description":"The recent Singapore medical professionals tax ruling highlights lessons on business structuring, tax planning, documentation, and managing compliance risks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance","og_description":"The recent Singapore medical professionals tax ruling highlights lessons on business structuring, tax planning, documentation, and managing compliance risks.","og_url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/","og_site_name":"CST Tax Singapore","article_published_time":"2026-06-24T02:22:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-25T02:50:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":738,"url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425-1024x738.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Boon Tan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boon Tan","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/"},"author":{"name":"Boon Tan","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/f1b27565c3a54305840cd83ab939aefb"},"headline":"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance","datePublished":"2026-06-24T02:22:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-25T02:50:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/"},"wordCount":1063,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png","articleSection":["Singapore Tax System"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/","url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/","name":"When Corporate Structuring Becomes Tax Avoidance","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png","datePublished":"2026-06-24T02:22:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-25T02:50:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/f1b27565c3a54305840cd83ab939aefb"},"description":"The recent Singapore medical professionals tax ruling highlights lessons on business structuring, tax planning, documentation, and managing compliance risks.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/06\/when-corporate-structuring-becomes-tax-avoidance-e1782354882425.png","width":1332,"height":960},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#website","url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/","name":"CST Tax Singapore","description":"International Tax and Accounting Services","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/#\/schema\/person\/f1b27565c3a54305840cd83ab939aefb","name":"Boon Tan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/05\/ENGN-076-colour-scaled-e1653290114550-96x96.jpg","url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/05\/ENGN-076-colour-scaled-e1653290114550-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/05\/ENGN-076-colour-scaled-e1653290114550-96x96.jpg","caption":"Boon Tan"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/about-us\/boon-tan\/"],"url":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/blog\/author\/boon\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6363\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csttax.com\/en-sg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}